 |
Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Cruachan Helping with the Count

Joined: 19 May 2008 Posts: 296
Location: The English Midlands
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:09 pm Post subject: Hang 'em high? |
|
|
Alex Salmond interview with the Daily Telgraph.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/n...Scottish-rope-after-election.html
Mr Salmond said: “There’s a vast, overwhelming majority of people in Scotland, regardless of political preference, who rather like the idea of the Westminster parliament being hung by a Scottish rope.
“I don’t think a Tory majority is a shoo-in by any means. I think a hung parliament or a balanced parliament of some kind is still more than an arithmetic possibility. It’s a strong possibility".
Personally I don't disagree with his analysis, but I think I preferred the previous analogy of "dancing to a Scottish Jig".
Not sure if the Telegraph has much of a circulation north of the Border but given the SNP electoral strategy has to be focussed on the floating/undecided voters, more careful language might be wise.
People tend to prefer dancing over murder
If the SNP achieve anywhere near the target of 20 Westminster seats next year, that would be a Big Moment, but would Cameron not be more likely to turn to the Ulster Unionsts in a hung-Parliament scenario before getting into bed with "narrow minded separatists"?
_________________ IT'S TIME.
http://loosechange-cruachan.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stevie Independentist

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 1179
|
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 2:37 pm Post subject: Re: Hang 'em high? |
|
|
| Cruachan wrote: | Not sure if the Telegraph has much of a circulation north of the Border but given the SNP electoral strategy has to be focused on the floating/undecided voters, more careful language might be wise.
|
Once I would have agreed with you but not any longer. I do get your point, I just think the time when the Tory-nat (Iain somebody...?) said it well when he called them, "a nation of numpties".
The time for walking on eggshells is past. I'm not suggesting being unpleasant but simply continue to be direct and honest.
If the voters don't like it, they were weak supporters and wouldn't vote SNP anyway.
Yes, be careful but be direct and honest, they seem to be willing to go with that. And the beauty is, it's not a ploy or a strategy. _________________ Every man dies, not every man really lives.
Alba gu bràth! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 1 Strike
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 5558
Location: Oh, I get about a bit.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:19 pm Post subject: Re: Hang 'em high? |
|
|
"There’s a vast, overwhelming majority of people in Scotland, regardless of political preference, who rather like the idea of the Westminster parliament being hung by a Scottish rope. "
There's Big Eck deluding himself again about how much support his pet project of independence has.
"If the SNP achieve anywhere near the target of 20 Westminster seats next year, that would be a Big Moment, but would Cameron not be more likely to turn to the Ulster Unionsts in a hung-Parliament scenario before getting into bed with "narrow minded separatists"?"
In Northern Ireland, the "Ulster Conservatives and Unionists" are one electoral force for European and UK elections - or at least will be in the latter case in the next election. That said, the UUP's only current MP is practically Labourite in her sympathies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 2752
Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even staunch opponents of independence would probably be tickled by the thought of Scottish MPs calling the shots in Westminster. I'm pretty sure that's what Alex meant, rather than your interpretation that everybody's in favour of independence. After all, why bother with a referendum if the whole country's so obviously behind the idea of independence? _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 1 Strike
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 5558
Location: Oh, I get about a bit.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Holebender wrote: | | Even staunch opponents of independence would probably be tickled by the thought of Scottish MPs calling the shots in Westminster. I'm pretty sure that's what Alex meant, rather than your interpretation that everybody's in favour of independence. |
I hardly think many Unionists want to see their parliament "hung" by the neck.
| Quote: | | After all, why bother with a referendum if the whole country's so obviously behind the idea of independence? |
I suppose deluding himself was probably the wrong implication: trying to delude other people is what he was up to, the scoundrel.
| Cruachan wrote: | | If the SNP achieve anywhere near the target of 20 Westminster seats next year, that would be a Big Moment, but would Cameron not be more likely to turn to the Ulster Unionsts in a hung-Parliament scenario before getting into bed with "narrow minded separatists"? |
It wouldn't be hung then. The UUP are taking the Conservative whip at Westminster after the next election as part of the Ulster Conservatives and Unionists joint electoral force. They will, in virtually all matters, be Tory MPs. Whilst it might not come immediately, I think it will be interesting to see a Northern Ireland Secretary with a Northern Ireland seat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|