Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org
Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Leaving the Union?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index -> Scottish Politics and Independence
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
thetimeisnow
No Longer a Wean


Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 91

PostPosted: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:05 pm    Post subject: Leaving the Union? Reply with quote

What would be so bad about Scotland leaving the union and becoming an independent country?

What are the postives of being part of the Union?

What are the negatives?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thetimeisnow
No Longer a Wean


Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 91

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:24 am    Post subject: Re: Leaving the Union? Reply with quote

thetimeisnow wrote:
What would be so bad about Scotland leaving the union and becoming an independent country?

What are the postives of being part of the Union?

What are the negatives?


No negatives then - so let's do it!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLG
Born Again..........and still Scottish!


Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 5515
Location: Dùn Eideann

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well one negative might be if the 'rest of the UK' try and screw us over as we leave. That could make life difficult. The UK government have already tried to twist the EU rules so that we would be ejected from the EU on leaving the UK and would have to reapply. I know that may not concern some anti-EU folk out there, but it's just an example.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gypsum_Fantastic
On A Journey (500 Miles)


Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 1:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SLG wrote:
The UK government have already tried to twist the EU rules so that we would be ejected from the EU on leaving the UK and would have to reapply.


Leaving the European Union would be one of the few benefits of Scottish independence. If the SNP were to campaign on such an issue, I would consider them. If, however, they simply want to suck on the larger Brussels teat then what's the point? Indepedence from what?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLG
Born Again..........and still Scottish!


Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 5515
Location: Dùn Eideann

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's a point that many in the party have made themselves. The point the party would probably make would be that by making a statement regarding staying in the EU, Scotland retains a level of stability while the very complicated matter of dissolving the British state gets underway. After that we would have the choice to vote for an anti-EU party if we so wished in order to be independent of Brussels as well.

Personally I would prefer it if the party said that Scotland would remain in the EU until all settlements with the rest of the UK had been made, and then they would hold a referendum on the EU within a certain period of time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Gypsum_Fantastic
On A Journey (500 Miles)


Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 28

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What stability does the EU provide?

One of the reasons the SNP are so unattractive is that their proposals aren't so 'radical' after all. They essentially promote an unhealthy stodge of greater bureaucracy, taxation and red tape. If they genuinely believe Scotland's economic interests are best served by independence then it is illogical to then say it is equally best served by remaining tied to a corrupt, business-strangling organisation. It cannot have one without the other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLG
Born Again..........and still Scottish!


Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 5515
Location: Dùn Eideann

PostPosted: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The stability is in knowing what powers, treaties exist and will remain in place for at least a certain period of time. If/when Scotland pulls out of the EU, it will be necessary to renegotiate trade agreements, and many other cross-EU agreements that exist. It is not necessary to do this at the same time as negotiating the break up of the UK. I think it would be more transparent if we can look solely at the powers held at Westminster, and repatriate them. After that, we can look at whether it is in our best interest to repatriate those powers held in Brussels.

At least the SNP would reduce the number of parliaments ruling over us from 3 to 2. I would think that government outside the UK would be much more efficient than it is at present. At heart though, the SNP are a democratic party. After independence the people will decide what type of government they want and that is when I expect to see radical change. Radical change that will never happen within the context of the UK.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Maol.Chaluim
'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!


Joined: 18 Sep 2005
Posts: 418
Location: Glaschu

PostPosted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Haven't seen a good reason to remain in the Union yet..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thetimeisnow
No Longer a Wean


Joined: 15 Sep 2005
Posts: 91

PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gypsum_Fantastic wrote:
What stability does the EU provide?

One of the reasons the SNP are so unattractive is that their proposals aren't so 'radical' after all. They essentially promote an unhealthy stodge of greater bureaucracy, taxation and red tape. If they genuinely believe Scotland's economic interests are best served by independence then it is illogical to then say it is equally best served by remaining tied to a corrupt, business-strangling organisation. It cannot have one without the other.


So I take it you don't vote then from your enthusiasm. I would rather vote for SNP, independence then the Scottish people can decide whether we wish to remain in Europe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shadowman
No Longer a Wean


Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maol.Chaluim wrote:
Haven't seen a good reason to remain in the Union yet..


How about being part of a country that has instant global recognition, the 5th largest economy in the world (with some of the soundest underpinnings), a global financial centre, worldwide influence, respected and capable armed forces, a generous wellfare state, universal healthcare and education?

Doesn't sound all bad to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aventinian
'Our Scotland' Fossil


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 4210
Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SLG wrote:
Personally I would prefer it if the party said that Scotland would remain in the EU until all settlements with the rest of the UK had been made, and then they would hold a referendum on the EU within a certain period of time.


That's not an opinion!

The SNP et al. are fast becoming the parties of referendums rather than ideologies. 'A referendum on independence' followed quickly by a referendum on the monarch, the EU, a written constitution... what next?!

Referendums are infrequently used in this country for a reason: the are alien to, and inconsistant with, our political process and the entire Westminster Model of goverance.

If you're going to back something, do so publicly. Don't just pass the buck to the people.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aventinian
'Our Scotland' Fossil


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 4210
Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shadowman wrote:
Maol.Chaluim wrote:
Haven't seen a good reason to remain in the Union yet..


How about being part of a country that has instant global recognition, the 5th largest economy in the world (with some of the soundest underpinnings), a global financial centre, worldwide influence, respected and capable armed forces, a generous wellfare state, universal healthcare and education?

Doesn't sound all bad to me.


I deliberately avoided that one as to answer it would take far too much time out of my precious drinking hours.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Maol.Chaluim
'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!


Joined: 18 Sep 2005
Posts: 418
Location: Glaschu

PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 10:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shadowman wrote:
Maol.Chaluim wrote:
Haven't seen a good reason to remain in the Union yet..


How about being part of a country that has instant global recognition

So does Scotland.
Shadowman wrote:
the 5th largest economy in the world (with some of the soundest underpinnings)

The USA is the largest economy in the world. Do you want to join them? If you're trying to present an economic argument against independence, you have either not seen the wealth of evidence, from the British government among others, that an independent Scotland is perfectly viable, or you choose to ignore it.
Shadowman wrote:
a global financial centre

Edinburgh is the second biggest financial centre in the UK, and one of the biggest in Europe.
Shadowman wrote:
worldwide influence

British governments never blindly follow US foriegn policy, of course...
Shadowman wrote:
respected and capable armed forces

Capable? No doubt. Respeceted? Depends who you ask...
Shadowman wrote:
a generous wellfare state, universal healthcare and education?

You're assuming these would automatically disappear after independence.

Have you considered the fact that the "country" which we're currently part of is refered to as "England" in most parts of the world?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shadowman
No Longer a Wean


Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maol.Chaluim wrote:
Shadowman wrote:
Maol.Chaluim wrote:
Haven't seen a good reason to remain in the Union yet..


How about being part of a country that has instant global recognition

So does Scotland.
Shadowman wrote:
the 5th largest economy in the world (with some of the soundest underpinnings)

The USA is the largest economy in the world. Do you want to join them? If you're trying to present an economic argument against independence, you have either not seen the wealth of evidence, from the British government among others, that an independent Scotland is perfectly viable, or you choose to ignore it.
Shadowman wrote:
a global financial centre

Edinburgh is the second biggest financial centre in the UK, and one of the biggest in Europe.
Shadowman wrote:
worldwide influence

British governments never blindly follow US foriegn policy, of course...
Shadowman wrote:
respected and capable armed forces

Capable? No doubt. Respeceted? Depends who you ask...
Shadowman wrote:
a generous wellfare state, universal healthcare and education?

You're assuming these would automatically disappear after independence.

Have you considered the fact that the "country" which we're currently part of is refered to as "England" in most parts of the world?


An independent Scotland would certainly be no richer than it is now, as most of the oil has been depleted. Apart from that, what big future potential industry does Scotland have up its sleeve?

As for Edinburgh being a big financial centre, it would be ridiculous to compare it with the London, New York or Tokyo. Maybe an independent Scotland could compete with Scandinavia or Central Europe, but it would never be able to earn that kind of invisible exports that London generates for the whole UK.

About the welfare state: I didn't claim that it would disappear after independence, but there will be less potential funding availabe for it after the loss of subsidy from the Barnett Formula.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rinty
Ready For Afterlife!


Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 2538
Location: SW Scotland

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:24 pm    Post subject: i Reply with quote

Quote:
How about being part of a country that has instant global recognition, the 5th largest economy in the world (with some of the soundest underpinnings), a global financial centre, worldwide influence, respected and capable armed forces, a generous wellfare state, universal healthcare and education?


Scotland has all of that already.

Quote:
most of the oil has been depleted


If by "most" you mean half then OK.

Quote:
what big future potential industry does Scotland have up its sleeve?


If Scotlands oil runs out so does the UKs, what big future industry has the UK up its sleeve, considering that most of the current chancellors plans are based on oil windfalls and high house prices.

Quote:
About the welfare state: I didn't claim that it would disappear after independence, but there will be less potential funding availabe for it after the loss of subsidy from the Barnett Formula.


As the barnet formula does not apply to welfare then that is not the case. Also Scotlands welfare spending would be determined by its own government. Is Norway struggling to keep its pensions or welfare going? Is Ireland?

It is ridiculous to suggest that scotlands welfare spending would be reduced under independence without knowing the policy of the first independent govt of Scotland, It could rise or fall. But barnet has NOTHING to do with this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wallacesclaymore
No Longer a Wean


Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 94
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would have been a bold or highly optimistic commentator who would have predicted two years ago that Edinburgh’s financial services sector would be sitting where it is now.

The city boasts two of the top ten banks in Europe, measured by market capitalisation, and three of the top ten life and pensions companies in the UK (see table, right).


But it could all have been so different. There were anxious moments for the Edinburgh finance sector last year when The Royal Bank of Scotland broke off negotiations over plans for a substantial head office building in the city centre and hinted that it could house large numbers of staff south of the Border.

However, Scotland’s biggest company has now concluded the purchase of a site at Gogarburn and is to house 3,500 people in a 500,000 sq ft building. The scale of that investment means that the Royal Bank is more likely to continue to base its HQ in Scotland, although such a future cannot be guaranteed.

There was similar concern over whether Edinburgh would retain the HQ of HBOS, the merged Bank of Scotland and Halifax, but again, the decision went the city’s way.

Ray Perman, the chief executive of Scottish Financial Enterprise (SFE), says this gives Edinburgh, and Scotland, a strong position on which to build for the future. He says: "Any future rounds of consolidation that happen are liable to add to the strengths of these companies rather than subtract from them. In the meantime, companies are moving in and the ones already here are adding to their activities."

However, while remaining optimistic and believing the future is bright, Perman stresses there is no room for complacency. As he points out, a study conducted for Scottish Enterprise shows that the perception abroad of Scotland as a major financial centre does not reflect the reality.

A telephone survey of business decision-makers in the top 12 leading global financial centres found that Edinburgh/Glasgow was cited spontaneously as a key financial centre by only one respondent out of more than 250 members of the global financial community.

Recent developments suggest that Edinburgh and Scotland have not yet managed to communicate to the global financial world the strength of what already exists here.

Funds under management topped a record £350 billion prior to the recent market reverses. There are other signs of strength in the capital’s financial sector. In the past 18 months, Edinburgh-based investment companies have recruited an unprecedented number of senior investment managers; one estimate puts the figure at 50.

Edinburgh has some attractive assets, a better work-life balance and a treasure-trove of good golf courses to choose from. But there are other professional reasons that make the city attractive, particularly as a fund management centre.

A number of interesting specialist investment houses have developed and there is the hard-to-quantify advantage that you are away from the "herd instinct" of the City of London where people tend to jump on the latest bandwagon with quite mixed results. But how important was that factor in the improved performance of many Scottish-based investment houses in 2001? As Helen Highley, leader of Scottish Enterprise’s financial services team, points out, the sector in Scotland has grown four times faster than the industry in the rest of the UK. "Edinburgh is the engine for the whole industry in Scotland, " she says.

In addition to the work done by SFE, another organisation, Scottish Investment Operations (SIO), has been formed to promote what is normally referred to as the back-office function of financial services.

Investment operations currently account for about 4,000 jobs, a figure that SIO chief executive Linda Houston is attempting to boost with promotion of the sub-sector. These bodies are also hopeful that Edinburgh and Scotland could attract more financial services companies to move operations from London to north of the Border. Many major companies are reconsidering their current practice of housing all their operations in large buildings in the City in the wake of the 11 September terrorist attacks.

Another factor is the hefty rents in Canary Wharf, which are already causing some finance houses to move into the West End.

Most inward investors to Scotland and particularly the financial services companies have pinpointed the quality of the available workforce as a major attraction. With unemployment in the Edinburgh area dropping to 2.5 per cent, it is also beginning to become a major challenge. The latest Edinburgh and Lothians Structure Plan suggests that the unmet labour demand in the city will rise from the 1999 figure of 64,500 to 85,000 in 2015, an increase of 32 per cent.

SFE stresses that this challenge must be met now with rapid changes in policy by local councils and the Scottish Executive to allow more housebuilding in the city area and above all, improved transport. A recent SFE paper on planning for the future of the capital, concluded: "Despite a proliferation of projects, the transport strategy for Edinburgh still appears to lack coherence."

One of the keys to maintaining the flow of increased financial services investment will be to make commuting easier. In areas such as East Lothian and Fife this is a must to ensure a future supply of financial services employees and increasing prosperity for a burgeoning city area.

Perman goes further and says there is a lack of political will at the executive level to tackle the problems. "The problem with the politicians is not just that they don’t understand the financial services industry but they don’t understand the economy and they don’t seem very interested to learn."

Perman believes that Scottish politicians have not grasped the importance of the financial services sector to the Scottish economy. He is calling for a change in thinking which would include close co-operation between Edinburgh and Glasgow.

Overall, the scale of the challenges to be met are large but so are the opportunities. In addition to the indigenous strengths, Edinburgh has succeeded in attracting major global companies such as Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Bank of New York, JP Morgan and Mellon Newton.

Most of these players have added to their original investment and workforce and the scale of their operations in the city. Several are pitching for business in Europe which would be handled from their operations in Edinburgh.

Since 1995, financial services output in Scotland has expanded by 50 per cent. The potential exists for that level of growth to continue. Scotland as a whole will need to produce more coherent thinking and performance than we have thus far seen, if it is to realise that potential.

From the Scotsman...

Evidently, companies like Standard Life Investments (now making MASSIVE inroads as an INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT HOUSE) are mere toys ....

I think not.

Next??????
_________________
SNP x 3 .... 3rd May 2007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shadowman
No Longer a Wean


Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wallacesclaymore wrote:
It would have been a bold or highly optimistic commentator who would have predicted two years ago that Edinburgh’s financial services sector would be sitting where it is now.

The city boasts two of the top ten banks in Europe, measured by market capitalisation, and three of the top ten life and pensions companies in the UK (see table, right).


But it could all have been so different. There were anxious moments for the Edinburgh finance sector last year when The Royal Bank of Scotland broke off negotiations over plans for a substantial head office building in the city centre and hinted that it could house large numbers of staff south of the Border.

However, Scotland’s biggest company has now concluded the purchase of a site at Gogarburn and is to house 3,500 people in a 500,000 sq ft building. The scale of that investment means that the Royal Bank is more likely to continue to base its HQ in Scotland, although such a future cannot be guaranteed.

There was similar concern over whether Edinburgh would retain the HQ of HBOS, the merged Bank of Scotland and Halifax, but again, the decision went the city’s way.

Ray Perman, the chief executive of Scottish Financial Enterprise (SFE), says this gives Edinburgh, and Scotland, a strong position on which to build for the future. He says: "Any future rounds of consolidation that happen are liable to add to the strengths of these companies rather than subtract from them. In the meantime, companies are moving in and the ones already here are adding to their activities."

However, while remaining optimistic and believing the future is bright, Perman stresses there is no room for complacency. As he points out, a study conducted for Scottish Enterprise shows that the perception abroad of Scotland as a major financial centre does not reflect the reality.

A telephone survey of business decision-makers in the top 12 leading global financial centres found that Edinburgh/Glasgow was cited spontaneously as a key financial centre by only one respondent out of more than 250 members of the global financial community.

Recent developments suggest that Edinburgh and Scotland have not yet managed to communicate to the global financial world the strength of what already exists here.

Funds under management topped a record £350 billion prior to the recent market reverses. There are other signs of strength in the capital’s financial sector. In the past 18 months, Edinburgh-based investment companies have recruited an unprecedented number of senior investment managers; one estimate puts the figure at 50.

Edinburgh has some attractive assets, a better work-life balance and a treasure-trove of good golf courses to choose from. But there are other professional reasons that make the city attractive, particularly as a fund management centre.

A number of interesting specialist investment houses have developed and there is the hard-to-quantify advantage that you are away from the "herd instinct" of the City of London where people tend to jump on the latest bandwagon with quite mixed results. But how important was that factor in the improved performance of many Scottish-based investment houses in 2001? As Helen Highley, leader of Scottish Enterprise’s financial services team, points out, the sector in Scotland has grown four times faster than the industry in the rest of the UK. "Edinburgh is the engine for the whole industry in Scotland, " she says.

In addition to the work done by SFE, another organisation, Scottish Investment Operations (SIO), has been formed to promote what is normally referred to as the back-office function of financial services.

Investment operations currently account for about 4,000 jobs, a figure that SIO chief executive Linda Houston is attempting to boost with promotion of the sub-sector. These bodies are also hopeful that Edinburgh and Scotland could attract more financial services companies to move operations from London to north of the Border. Many major companies are reconsidering their current practice of housing all their operations in large buildings in the City in the wake of the 11 September terrorist attacks.

Another factor is the hefty rents in Canary Wharf, which are already causing some finance houses to move into the West End.

Most inward investors to Scotland and particularly the financial services companies have pinpointed the quality of the available workforce as a major attraction. With unemployment in the Edinburgh area dropping to 2.5 per cent, it is also beginning to become a major challenge. The latest Edinburgh and Lothians Structure Plan suggests that the unmet labour demand in the city will rise from the 1999 figure of 64,500 to 85,000 in 2015, an increase of 32 per cent.

SFE stresses that this challenge must be met now with rapid changes in policy by local councils and the Scottish Executive to allow more housebuilding in the city area and above all, improved transport. A recent SFE paper on planning for the future of the capital, concluded: "Despite a proliferation of projects, the transport strategy for Edinburgh still appears to lack coherence."

One of the keys to maintaining the flow of increased financial services investment will be to make commuting easier. In areas such as East Lothian and Fife this is a must to ensure a future supply of financial services employees and increasing prosperity for a burgeoning city area.

Perman goes further and says there is a lack of political will at the executive level to tackle the problems. "The problem with the politicians is not just that they don’t understand the financial services industry but they don’t understand the economy and they don’t seem very interested to learn."

Perman believes that Scottish politicians have not grasped the importance of the financial services sector to the Scottish economy. He is calling for a change in thinking which would include close co-operation between Edinburgh and Glasgow.

Overall, the scale of the challenges to be met are large but so are the opportunities. In addition to the indigenous strengths, Edinburgh has succeeded in attracting major global companies such as Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Bank of New York, JP Morgan and Mellon Newton.

Most of these players have added to their original investment and workforce and the scale of their operations in the city. Several are pitching for business in Europe which would be handled from their operations in Edinburgh.

Since 1995, financial services output in Scotland has expanded by 50 per cent. The potential exists for that level of growth to continue. Scotland as a whole will need to produce more coherent thinking and performance than we have thus far seen, if it is to realise that potential.

From the Scotsman...

Evidently, companies like Standard Life Investments (now making MASSIVE inroads as an INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT HOUSE) are mere toys ....

I think not.

Next??????


So Edinburgh has 2 major banking headquarters. What else is there?

Apart from tartan and shortbread...

One or two big projects do not an economy make.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
azzuri
'Our Scotland' Fossil


Joined: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 3771

PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scottish cringe indeed - that is of course if you ARE Scottish?

Did you ignore the rest of the above article and just pick out the '2 large financial instututions' bit?

Scotland could attract other major institutions easily simply by lowering corporate taxes. This is just one course of action that could help grow the financial sector. There are many others, but while we are part of the UK we cannot control these things on our own - the size of the financial sector is controlled by London. So if you are going to have a 'go' at the size or lack of diversity in the Edinburgh financial sector - make sure your obvious distaste flows south.

I know it's a challenge to try and convince you that you might actually be wrong, but I hope the folk on here are up to the challenge. Unfortunately many people such as yourself are completely unwilling to accept the facts and figures put in front of them which prove that Scotland would be better off - why is this?

Go on, surprise us all, look at the facts presented and just agree that financially Scotland would be far better off. This doesn't mean that you have to agree that Scotland should be Independent however. You might enjoy being a part of the UK apart from this and this is entirely your perogative - you cannot be 'wrong' about that.
_________________
"Every single person on this planet is unique. Just like everyone else..." - Random Guy in Edinburgh Pub

Possibly the funniest site in the world, 'The Daily Mash' - http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
SLG
Born Again..........and still Scottish!


Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 5515
Location: Dùn Eideann

PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aventinian wrote:
SLG wrote:
Personally I would prefer it if the party said that Scotland would remain in the EU until all settlements with the rest of the UK had been made, and then they would hold a referendum on the EU within a certain period of time.


That's not an opinion!

The SNP et al. are fast becoming the parties of referendums rather than ideologies. 'A referendum on independence' followed quickly by a referendum on the monarch, the EU, a written constitution... what next?!

Referendums are infrequently used in this country for a reason: the are alien to, and inconsistant with, our political process and the entire Westminster Model of goverance.

If you're going to back something, do so publicly. Don't just pass the buck to the people.

I Scottish independence is alien to the Westminster model as well. As is devolution. I desperately want Scotland to be governed in a manner very different from Westminster.

As for referenda, did you disagree with the recent referenda by Edinburgh City Council on the road tolls and the housing stock transfer? In both cases the people voted against the policy supported by the council. People vote for parties for a variety of reasons, so for some reasons a referendum is very appropriate. So yes, I would support a referendum on the monarch, the EU and a written constitution. Can't think of anything else at the moment.

As for my opinion. At the moment, I would like to see Scotland step back somewhat from the EU. After independence, I will probably support a party that has that stance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Aventinian
'Our Scotland' Fossil


Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 4210
Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.

PostPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maol.Chaluim wrote:
The USA is the largest economy in the world. Do you want to join them? If you're trying to present an economic argument against independence, you have either not seen the wealth of evidence, from the British government among others, that an independent Scotland is perfectly viable, or you choose to ignore it.


For the last time, of course an independent Scotland is viable. An independent Ethiopia has been viable for decades and has existed. Declaring my county independent would probably be fairly viable.

The fact is - is it a good idea. The answer is no. In a flexible Union, we would benefit from economies of scale without any unappealing limitations. I've yet to see any argument against that.


Quote:
Edinburgh is the second biggest financial centre in the UK, and one of the biggest in Europe.


Scotland does not have the control of a long-standing and trusted global currency for one. And Edinburgh just doesn't compare really...

Quote:
British governments never blindly follow US foriegn policy, of course...


No, they don't. Tony Blair largely believes in the same ideas as the American Establishment at present, but that means nothing. If you want great change in the world, vote for a different party.

Quote:
Capable? No doubt. Respeceted? Depends who you ask...


I've yet to meet anyone who does not respect the professionalism and performance of the UK armed forces. Many would agree that they are the finest in the world.

Imagine how much it would cost for Scotland alone to sustain the same level of defence alone. Then you'll maybe see what I was talking about when I said economies of scale...

Shadowman wrote:
a generous wellfare state, universal healthcare and education?
You're assuming these would automatically disappear after independence.


Are you trying to say any of the supposed benefits of Nationalism could never be replicated in a situation where sovereignty rests outside of Edinburgh? I believe you are throwing stones around your glass house here.

Quote:
Have you considered the fact that the "country" which we're currently part of is refered to as "England" in most parts of the world?


By a few ignorant people, admittedly. But they're hardly worth worrying about.

I'm certainly not going to change my political beliefs based on the stupidity of foreigners.

rs_azzuri wrote:
Scotland could attract other major institutions easily simply by lowering corporate taxes.


Somehow I don't see that happening in Socialismshire.

Quote:
I know it's a challenge to try and convince you that you might actually be wrong, but I hope the folk on here are up to the challenge. Unfortunately many people such as yourself are completely unwilling to accept the facts and figures put in front of them which prove that Scotland would be better off - why is this?


Maybe if you'd listened to, or commented on, that fellow's points re: your facts and figures (which, despite all the talk, seem to be relatively thin on the ground around here) then you may see why he chooses to ignore your points.

Quote:
Go on, surprise us all, look at the facts presented and just agree that financially Scotland would be far better off. This doesn't mean that you have to agree that Scotland should be Independent however. You might enjoy being a part of the UK apart from this and this is entirely your perogative - you cannot be 'wrong' about that.


Well, I personally don't see any economic case for dissolving the UK Union unless it would leave both Scotland and the remainder of the UK in a better financial position. Taking the UK for a ride financially for two hundred years and then jumping ship when the empire is deminished and the cash is a bit tight would just be bloody bad manners - not to mention tribalistic.

That said, I still don't agree with your economic pounding on and certainly see no reason why our country (all of it, not just the northern bit) cannot prosper as well, and better, within the structure of the UK.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index -> Scottish Politics and Independence All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Our Scotland Hit Counter 'Top Scottish Websites' - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Top Site - Topsites Top 100 Scottish Websites Our Scotland Forums Critical Acclaim ~ Politically Progressive Top Sites Tartan Army Topsites View Site Stats Our Scotland Blog Scottish Politics Scottish Lads