 |
Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SLG Born Again..........and still Scottish!

Joined: 16 Sep 2005 Posts: 5515 Location: Dùn Eideann
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:23 pm Post subject: Salmond opens talks with Greens |
|
|
http://www.theherald.co.uk/politics/53716.html
| Quote: | Robbie Dinwoodie, The Herald, 5 January 2006
Alex Salmond has opened negotiations with the Greens over a possible
future coalition with the Scottish National Party at Holyrood.
The Herald understands that a high-level meeting was held before
Christmas between the SNP and the Greens with a view to examining policy issues ahead of the next election and possible coalition of "the thistle and the sunflower" thereafter.
It is believed that, on the back of a series of Holyrood votes where it
was clear there was a degree of consensus, senior strategists from both
parties agreed to get together.
The result was a meeting between Mr Salmond, the SNP leader, Bruce
Crawford, the party's Holyrood business convener, and a delegation from
the Scottish Greens involving two MSPs who are seen as senior party
strategists, Mark Ballard and Patrick Harvie.
A senior SNP source said: "It is clearly in both parties' interests to
look at current political opportunities and at options that may exist
after 2007.
"We both agree that the executive parties are failing Scotland, so there
is plenty to talk about.
"Alex intends becoming the next first minister and will do that as
leader of the largest party in the Scottish Parliament. If we are
serious about forming the government of Scotland then these are the kind
of discussions that have to take place."
A spokesman for the Scottish Greens confirmed that the meeting took
place in the run-up to Christmas. Shiona Baird, the party's co-convener,
described the discussions as "informal at this stage".
Ms Baird, who leads the party jointly with Robin Harper, the original
breakthrough MSP, said: "The Greens are increasingly being recognised as
a fixture in the Scottish political landscape, and respected for our
ability to win cross-party support for our campaigns in the Scottish
Parliament. We can expect to make gains at the 2007 election."
There are tensions between the Nationalist and Green blocs, not least
over issues such as transport infrastructure and the need to be seen as
having a pro-business agenda.
But the two parties are close on a number of key issues, such as
Holyrood's powers, nuclear power, private finance and asylum and
rendition.
Labour won 50 seats at the last Holyrood election, compared with the
SNP's 27, but Mr Salmond has set a target of winning a swing of more
than 8%, which would bring about 20 additional constituency seats and
make his the largest single party.
Achieving close to or more than 50 seats would leave the SNP looking for
the additional 15 or so seats through coalition which would allow it to
form a government.
The Greens currently have seven seats, while the Socialists have six,
and there were four independent or single issue candidates elected. The
LibDems won 17 and the Tories 18.
The talks revealed by The Herald today indicate the first time in the UK
that a move has been made by an established party to involve the Greens
in potential coalition negotiations. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rinty Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 2598 Location: SW Scotland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:48 pm Post subject: i |
|
|
It's a very interseting development, although the differences are such that I cannot see a formal coalition.
Salmond and Fox both know where the SSP and SNP meet and where they disagree. The SSP agree with the SNP on all of the issues mentioned by the Herald that the SGP and SNP meet on. The differences between the Greens and SNP are also more or less the same divisions between the SSP and SNP.
We, of course, would not enter in to a formal coalition with anyone and have made that clear. We would, however, support a budget of a minority SNP govt or SNP/Green coalition to allow them to form an executive, and thereafter vote on an issue by issue basis. This is how I see the arrangement between the SNP and Greens eventually shaping up.
Interestingly the reports I got from the Greens Annual Conference was that there was a lot of talk about coalitions but it was the Lib Dems and Labour who were being looked at.
The Lib Dems would have to be brought into the SNPs coalition for it to work, in my opinion. For this to happen, the Lib Dems would have to concede more powers to Holyrood, which in principle they wouldn't object to. The SNP would potentially have to give up Independence in return for more fiscal powers for Holyrrod.
On the face of it most SNP members would be horrified at this, but in reality it would only happen if the SNP needed the Lib Dems to form an executive. If that was the scenario then the people of Scotland will not have made a clear statement at the ballot box for independence and the SNP should or could accept that and leave independence until they win a majority, or at least the combined votes/seats of the pro-independence parties are in the majority.
I do believe that the Greens get a pretty easy ride from the press though. They also seem exempt from actual analysis of their profile and results.
After the Cathcart and Livingston by elections we had the bizarre scene of Robin Harper contributing to a piece about the SSPs poor results at the by elections. Harper was lending weight to the argument that by election results showed the SSP to be finished. In fact, the SSP took more votes than the Greens over the 2 results and the results showed that support for the Greens had fallen further than the SSP.
The other very big factor that counters Shiona Bairds assertion that the Greens will do better in 2007 is the fact that the SSP look likely to not stand in the FPTP element of the 2007 elections.
There is no doubt (and SSP analysis of results bears this out) that the Greens vote was inflated by the fact that the SSP stood in every seat last time.
Many people who were torn between the two parties decided to vote SSP in the FPTP and Green with their list vote. Next time round it would only take a fraction of those votes to go to the SSP for the last results to be reversed. The other factor in this scenario is the lack of activists the Greens have. The SSP have a huge and growing membership in comparison. Last time round they were campaigning in 70 seats, next time they may be concentrating on the list.
An anecdotal example would be my own branch. We have a dozen or so members and a few supporters in local trades union branches. Last time round we campaigned in the FPTP seat until the last 3 days. Then we leafletted some schemes asking for the list vote. Next time round we would have all of our branch members working solely for that list vote.
The Greens membership in Ayrshire as a whole is similar to our wee branch, but we have 3 other branches in Ayrshire with around 50 active members outside of our branch, and considerable backing from local branches of several trades unions.
The asumption that the Greens will see a rise in their list vote and the SSP will fall as a pretty loose guess and I dont see it happening.
After 2007 Salmond might not see a coalition with the SGP as any way advantageous to the SNP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|