| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Maol.Chaluim 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!

Joined: 18 Sep 2005 Posts: 418 Location: Glaschu
|
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 10:58 am Post subject: You'll have had your referendum then... |
|
|
Once upon a time, the SNP argued that once they had a majority of seats at Westminster, they would delcare independence. Now they say that they'd hold a referendum first.
Is this really neccesary? In theory a majority of pro-independence MSPs (65+) is enough, and there are plenty who argue that, including the SEP and some members of the SNP, among others.
What do people think?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Niall Gaining a Reputation........

Joined: 16 Sep 2005 Posts: 178 Location: Cairnbulg
|
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2005 11:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
A Charaid.
In England, Parliament is sovereign. In Scotland the Scottish people are sovereign and any major decision must be taken by a plebicite (Referendum) because as you know only about 50%of the people actually vote in an election. It would therefore by highly undemocratic if 26% of the electorate made decisions affecting the other 74% as happens right now.
'S Mise
Niall. _________________ Cha deanar duine glic ach air a chosd fheinn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 4413 Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
To claim that the Scottish people are sovereign is rather false constitutional law. While I would argue against Parliament being sovereign (I don't even believe it was pre-Union in England, despite what Dicey may say on the subject) I believe it would be wrong to attach sovereignty to the Scottish people. Rather, I'd say in Scotland that internal political sovereignty does not rest with one group or institution and cannot be said to truly be a Scottish concept.
The only thing actually required to make Scotland an independent country is an Act of (the United Kingdom's) Parliament. I cannot foresee Parliament allowing secession without a clear majority consenting in a referendum...
...personally, I probably wouldn't allow it without a two-thirds majority in favour anyway. Then again, I am not a rather liberal legislature... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
azzuri 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 12 Sep 2005 Posts: 3792
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
with 2/3 in favour?
don't you believe in the principles of democracy? _________________ "Every single person on this planet is unique. Just like everyone else..." - Random Guy in Edinburgh Pub
Possibly the funniest site in the world, 'The Daily Mash' - http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 4413 Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I believed in the principles of true democracy, I wouldn't be allowing secession from an established state at all. And no, I believe democracy should be very strictly controlled - it is one of those beasts that must be kept chained to the ground.
We are a democracy, it does apply to this country after - however it takes its place behind many other constitutional and philosophical doctrines. In fact, I don't think I know many democracies that are quite as pure as Britain's. We live in a country where the constitution can be changed on the whim of 50%+1 MPs - cf: Canada, where constitutional amendments require provincial ratification, or the United States where constitutional amendments require 2/3rds consent of both the Senate and the House of Representatives.
This scares me, and makes for bad constitutional law - as we have seen with Tony Blair's abuses of ancient institutions like the office of the Lord Chancellor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maol.Chaluim 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!

Joined: 18 Sep 2005 Posts: 418 Location: Glaschu
|
Posted: Sun Jan 01, 2006 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 50%+1 MPs often represent 38-40% of the total votes cast. Pure democracy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 4413 Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah, intriguing point.
Incidently, I don't think even the SNP could be so deluded as to imagine (as the OP suggests) that they'd ever win a majority at Westminster... _________________ The resident pantomime villain.
'Socialists cry "Power to the people", and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean—power over people, power to the State.' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shagpile No Longer a Wean
Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 89
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2006 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What intrigues me is how some people believe this country is democratic! Can someone explain why it is perfectly acceptable to have safe seats in a democracy for example? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 4413 Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shagpile wrote: | | What intrigues me is how some people believe this country is democratic! Can someone explain why it is perfectly acceptable to have safe seats in a democracy for example? |
No country is really a democracy, thankfully. The nearest examples we have are the likes of Switzerland, but even then it is limited and controlled.
Safe seats simply mean the people there vote consistantly for a certain party. Nothing too dodgy about that. Certain areas are naturally Labour, some naturally Tory and so on.
I do believe there should be greater transparency in the process used to draw constituency boundaries. As far as I'm concerned, the Labour Party is quite guilty of gerrymandering. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SLG Born Again..........and still Scottish!

Joined: 16 Sep 2005 Posts: 5515 Location: Dùn Eideann
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aventinian wrote: | | Incidently, I don't think even the SNP could be so deluded as to imagine (as the OP suggests) that they'd ever win a majority at Westminster... |
Of course they thought they would eventually win the majority at Westminster. Pre-devolution (which many in the SNP didn't support), how else would the SNP prove a mandate for independence? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shagpile No Longer a Wean
Joined: 03 Jan 2006 Posts: 89
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Aventinian,
FYI I lived in CH, for just over 6 months, their kind of freedom and democracy is worth giving up the ghost for. Not our crap. Dont patronise you w****r.
Why is it good we dont have a democracy?
Would it not be great if every MP/MSP was worried s******s on election day? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 4413 Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Shagpile wrote: | Hi Aventinian,
FYI I lived in CH, for just over 6 months, their kind of freedom and democracy is worth giving up the ghost for. Not our crap. Dont patronise you w****r.
Why is it good we dont have a democracy?
Would it not be great if every MP/MSP was worried s******s on election day? |
Why is it good we don't have a democracy? Because democracy ignores the individual liberty of human beings and provides a pseudo-mandate for oppression. Not to mention that real democracy is a joke when the citizens are demanding lower taxes and higher public spending across the board.
The reason certain MPs are not worried shitless on election day is because people solidly back them as opposed to the opposition.
I didn't patronise you and it's rather obvious from your posts that you are the w***er. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|