| Archive for Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites. |
| ENGLISH JEW |
Eng Dem PostersGuysBefore you shoot me and strike me off the site, let me just explain why we ran the poster campaign for the mayoral elections. It works in both our favours that we might make it as uncomfortable as possible for those unionists who want to try and run our affairs, the posters did have a bit of cheek to them but we are trying to sort England out and we ran the posters with the full knowledge of some very senior politicans up Scotland ( but i can't mention names ). We are doing our bit to try and force change down here but it's a long hard slog, because the media won't allow anyone other than the big 3 air time then we have to do want we can with the time and cash available. So guys, while I see no need to beg for forgiveness, please don't see these posters as any sort of attack on Scotland but more like adding more fuel to your own fire. All of us within the Eng Dems want a free and independent Scotland as this will achieve our own goals of self determination for England and in the end full independence. Shalom |
||||||||||||
| azzuri |
It wasn't an attack against Scotland, but an attack on Scots.
Stirring up hatred is a dangerous path to go down, and demonising a whole nation based upon questionable figures can't do any good in the long-term. I can't help but think the EDs have made an enormous faux pas here. |
||||||||||||
| Dave Coull |
"English Jew" wrote "we ran the posters with the full knowledge of some very senior politicans up Scotland".
No matter how many "senior politicians" may have had knowledge of your intentions, these posters are so offensive, they merit a complaint that they breach race relations legislation. Maybe I should contact some of my friends in London suggesting they do just that. "English Jew" says "i can't mention names". It doesn't surprise me that any politician who gave the nod to this racism should feel they have to hide their complicity. I lived for over twelve years in London. During that time, I was one of the MAJORITY of Londoners who weren't born in London. Are you aware that there are hundreds of thousands of Scottish folk in London, and they have votes? But of course, it's all just a bit of harmless fun, isn't it? Just like the Nazi posters caricaturing Jews were harmless fun. |
||||||||||||
| Holebender |
A bit of cheek?
Imagine if these were BNP posters portraying Jews as money-grubbing thieves with big hooked noses and swarthy complexions. Is it still just a bit of cheek for the greater good? |
||||||||||||
| azzuri |
Exactly. Independence, but at what cost to Anglo-Scottish relations English Jew?.. |
||||||||||||
| Cymro |
If anyone is interested in seeing the English Democrats Election Broadcast for the mayor of London it's available on I-Player.
More Anti Scottish Rant basically. And it looks like some wierd "look into my eyes" video. http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/page...;start=2&version_pid=b009vtdm |
||||||||||||
| Aventinian |
It's like the BNP without the 'B' bit. | ||||||||||||
| Aventinian |
You'd at least thing he'd have bought a decent suit if he was going to be on the television. |
||||||||||||
| Holebender |
Anyone who is wondering what all the fuss is about can view the posters here: http://easishop.com/ourlondon/ind...task=view&id=18&Itemid=32
The Matt O'Connor (good English name) election broadcast can also be viewed at http://www.englishdemocrats.org.uk/ |
||||||||||||
| RadgeJougal |
Perhaps you should join. They need Scottish members of their persuasion. 
|
||||||||||||
| Aventinian |
What? I wear decent clothes and loathe Nationalism... |
||||||||||||
| Red Justice |
Glad to hear you wear decent clothes Av . No I think when nationalism reaches the pits of racial stirring it is not good and will reflect bad on the EDs.
We are not "subsidy junkies" in Scotland and I think the British treasury has done well from our oil over the decades. Perhaps the EDs should campaign for Scotland to have a parliament with full fiscal autonomy or tax raising powers as a move in the short term before full independence. Then we can be seen to pay our own way and not lead to misplaced English voter resentment. I cannot help the British cabinet or government being run by Scot Brits like Brown, Darling etc..but the broadcast by EDs is Anti-Scots people and why blame us? Perhaps blame the Labour voters in Scotland? But we do not want Tory rule either. |
||||||||||||
| Lewis |
I'd like you to read about Constructive and Destructive Nationalism.
I have noticed the mistake about the introduction of the BNP so I apologise. Here you ill some of the boxes because you instantly exclude people from English nationalism. You basically through attacking Scottish people are saying you are superior. This is utter tosh as you make your binding force the fact that you are all English and frankly you are edging towards something very dangerous. You should have pride, but not prejudice. Here's what you should aim for:
This involved not getting people riled, just getting your people to act in the interest of the country. The fact you have used the chance to attack Scottish people shows that you are not acting in the long term best interests of your country. |
||||||||||||
| cornubian |
The BNP, UKIP and the English Undemocrats are cut from the same cloth make no mistakes. | ||||||||||||
| Lewis |
It would be nice to see a constructive Nationalist English party, but England by nature is more right wing statist than Scotland which is centre-left and probably on the borderline between statist and liberal. If that appeals to them then they have opinions I disagree with, but I'm not a member of English society so they are entitled to their views. | ||||||||||||
| Andrew Constantine |
Unionist parties, one and all!
Without wishing to be controversial, I comment on one thing they have in common. All these three parties are pro-Unionist parties. Not one of them is in favour of independence for Scotland or England. The leading respectable pro-English independence party is already, in my opinion, the Free England Party. We are still very small in numbers compared to any one of the three pro-Union parties above, but we have progressed well from a new start in February 2008, and we have some outstanding activists who are very enthused about building the party. Regards Andrew Constantine |
||||||||||||
| Cymro |
Andrew, where does your new party stand on the status of Cornwall then? | ||||||||||||
| Andrew Constantine |
Free England Party policy on Cornwall
Hi I answered that good question on another thread by admitting we did not have such a policy. Fact is that since we got the party going in February we have been working hard to build it up and have foccussed on our core message of English Independence. My guess is that at our first AGM our party will decide on a policy which will at the very least be much warmer/attentive to Cornwall's special status than most other parties. But it will be up to what the party votes. I do think Cornwall is getting a very bad deal out of the Union. Why haven't the Cornish raised the roof about not even having a University! Regards, Andrew |
||||||||||||
| Cymro |
Well does your core principle of English independence include Cornwall or not? I'm not saying Campaign for Cornish Independence but is there at least an acceptance that Cornwall isn't a county of England a la Somerset or East Anglia but for want of a better word 'in an union' with it? Surely this would be kind of central for your new party - would the Free England Party stand in Cornwall or not? | ||||||||||||
| agentmancuso |
All nationalists are cut from the same cloth. |
||||||||||||
| Lewis |
I beg to differ, I tried to come up with a way of differentiating Nationalism and I came up with principles of constructive and destructive nationalism.
Basically Destructive (or Exclusive) Nationalism is where you say you are the best and you only welcome those who are already citizens, it can be to various degrees and it tends to be the more right wing folks who do this. Constructive (or Inclusive) Nationalism is the belief that your people are not prospering and so you act by making more people participate in the nation and you try and achieve independence through democracy and respect. I wrote it all down, but I believe it is slightly ignorant to put all nats under the one generalisation. |
||||||||||||
| agentmancuso |
All nationalism is predicated on the following:
1) the existence of an essential political entity 2) the existence of an external threat to the cohesion of this entity 3) the existence of a debt of allegiance to this political entity necessitating the taking of urgent steps to defend the cohesion of this entity. Utter fantasy of course. It's remarkable how intently nationalists claim " We're the good nationalists. It's those other guys that are the bad nationalists". How come nobody ever admits to being the bad nationalists? It's always someone else's fault.... |
||||||||||||
| William_Cleland |
Your usual nonsense. This really is school playground level stuff. The traits of the mindset you describe can easily be identified in the Westminster elite's attitude towards European integration but in your myopic parochial world view they don't qualify as being nationalists because nationalism for you only revolves around the Union of 1707. If your political philosophy is that it is a good thing for the national state to be governed from Edinburgh in the context of devolved issues why do you see it as the end of civilization as we have known it for a few reserved issues to be dealt with that way as well when the European Union provides a clear framework for continued political and economic union after independence? It has been a generation now since the SNP could sensibly be portrayed as a party driven by a 19th century style nationalism and people like Jim Fairlie who would fit your description at least to some extent left when the likes of Salmond and Sillars came to the fore. |
||||||||||||
| agentmancuso |
I doubt it very much. The attitude shown by the Westminster elite is, as usual, one of sheer populism. The attitude displayed by many English voters towards Europe is exactly the same as that displayed towards the UK by SNP voters, and equally reprehensible. Who said: 1) They're stealing all our taxes 2) They're dissolving our legal system 3) They're damaging our cultural integrity 4) They don't care about us, it's just a faceless (foreign) bureaucracy Was it a London cabbie whining about the EU, or a CyberNat whining about the UK? Peas in a pod.
Wrong again. They are nationalists. Nationalism revolves around an emotional attachment to a projected idea of the communal self (the "Nation") that is under attack. Dates have nothing to do with it; it's a state of mind. Either you believe that foreign baddies are trying to hurt your projected communal self, or you don't.
It doesn't. My political philosophy takes little account of the 'National State' idolatry. It is a good principle that power be exercised as closely to the ground as possible.
I don't. But the single greatest threat to civilization is - and always has been - the emotional attachment to a projected communal identity.
Salmond is a very capable politician. But then his recent comments about making Westminster dance to a Scottish tune could quite easily have been made by some 19th century nationalist zealot. Surely that made you cringe a bit? |
||||||||||||
| William_Cleland |
Back to the schoolteacher with a red pen approach of the line by line rebuttal I see. I'll repeat you are talking your usual nonsense. Scotland isn't a "state of mind". It has continued to have an existence as a national entity in many social contexts based on the fact that the incorporating Union of 1707 predated the Enlightenment and the modern nation state, which shaped the Jacobinism of the French Republic.
Support for devolution and/or independence is usually about creating a more normal state of affairs in which the administrative and cultural autonomy of the existing set of national institutions such as the legal and education systems is matched by legislative autonomy. For a supporter of devolution such as yourself to make such a song and dance about the addition of a few extra powers to Holyrood is nothing more than small minded sectarianism, in my opinion. As for your last sentence. Are you really so far gone in tribalism terms that you think I am an SNP supporter? I will reiterate that I am open minded towards but remain unconvinced by the arguments of going all the way to independence at this time. The sort of posture that somebody who truly isn't driven by either British or Scottish nationalism would tend to adopt if their prime concern is simply the improvement of governance and civil society. |
||||||||||||
| Holebender |
It's not that foreign baddies are trying to hurt my projected communal self, it's that the people in charge look out for themselves first and their interests do not coincide with the interests of my community. The best solution to that problem is to remove the power the remote central government has over my community, to become independent of them. | ||||||||||||
| agentmancuso |
No, it's a legal and administrative unit. Nationalism (i.e. the dual perception of a collective identity to be protected and the existence of 'negative outside' influences to be resisted) is a state of mind, and not a very healthy one either.
I'd be inclined to say that it was the Jacobinism of the French Republic which shaped the modern nation state, but that would only be to grant some validity to this irrelevant diversion.
Normal? You can't be serious.
On the contrary, I welcome and encourage the addition of extra powers to Holyrood.
You do appear to be getting rather cuddly with them of recent.
Hey, what do you know! We are agreed after all. |
||||||||||||
| agentmancuso |
The problem is that the people in charge will always be tempted to look after their own interests first. Which is why the powers of the state must be clearly delineated and why expansion of the state's area of operation ought to be resisted, irrespective of tribal identity. I remain highly dubious about "the interests of my community". How do you define your community? On what basis are you fit to decide what is in their interests anyway? Dangerous territory don't you think? I agree, though, with the principle that people should be as independent of the government as possible. |
||||||||||||
| Holebender |
My community is the community I live in. I hold an opinion on what is best for my community in the same way that every single citizen who marks a ballot paper on an election day holds an opinion on what is best for his or her community. Like every other voter, I am in no position to impose my will on everyone else (nor would I like to be) and my will will only prevail if enough of my fellow voters hold similar opinions and vote in the same way as I do.
It's not a difficult concept for most people to grasp. |
||||||||||||
| Alasdair |
If you follow this line of thought through to it's logical conclusion you must reach a point whereby there must be a single community ruled by a self appointed authotity ... which contradicts your first paragraph, perhaps I've misunderstood. Obviously this is not how democracy operates, the assumption is that everyone is fit to decide what is in the interests of the community and majority rules. Problems only arise with the definition of 'community' where individuals or groups within that community attempt to define it along racial or generally discriminatory lines. It is however very simple to define a community in terms of geographical or political boundaries and accept that those living and/or working within those boundaries as being part of the community. There is then a broader community which extends beyond political and geographical boundaries and so long as each community accepts the validity of the other communities to govern themselves as they see fit then there is no 'dangerous territory' to be had. It's not until you introduce individuals or groups who fail to accept those who are 'different' (in whatever way 'different' is defined) that any sort of danger arises. |
||||||||||||
| William_Cleland |
The UK pre-1997 was far from conventional given the UK is the only major western state to have the basis of its modern constitution formed before the Enlightenment in the era when the emerging notion of the national state was still very much tied into a particular form of national church. Having three separate national legal jurisdictions ruled by a shared parliament with an unelected head of state also acting as the figurehead of the national church on a hereditary basis in most of one but not the other two national legal jurisdictions is far from normal. It would be much more normal either to have three separate independent states each doing their own thing with their own national parliaments or to have only one national legal jurisdiction based on either a centralized or federal republic run according to a written constitution. The West Lothian Question sums up why there is still some way to go until the UK is truly normal but having a separate legislature at least partially responsible for each national legal system helped to remove one of the major anomalies. |
||||||||||||
| agentmancuso |
With all respect, I believe you have. There would seem to be no inconsistency involved in a) believing in the principle of limiting government to certain clearly defined spheres of operation and b) distrusting the arrogance of a fundamentalist minority determined to misrepresent their own personal identity crisis as being in the interests of the community.
Very reasonable, yes.
That'll be where nationalism comes in then. |
||||||||||||
| Lewis |
So all those English people who judge the Scots as inferior are all nationalists. The thing that annoys me about you8r arguement sis you just presume all nationalists are the same. What sort of nationalist am I that wants Scotland to have people from across the world to help us when/if we secede? Is that me saying I'm better than anyone else? No, I believe that our state would function better if it were independent. My belief is that I am no better or no worse than any person. To hold these ignorant views is an insult to your own intelligent, I am sure you are a very intelligent person, so why do you refuse to at least think about the other side. You are one of these people who form an opinion and stick to it, that's not a good thing because you get trapped in the past and frankly you can't move with society. |
||||||||||||
| Alasdair |
No. Nationalism came in just prior to the point where you said "Very reasonable, yes." The simple truth of the matter is that a national identity arising as a form of nationalism can occur where there is co-operation with those from out with ones community / nation. Whilst I am admittedly new to the forum (and therefore not entirely familiar with your opinions as expressed here) it seems that you are taking a very narrow view of nationalism based on the more extreme elements who label themselves as 'nationalists' where in fact they would be better labelled fascist and/or racist. Not all nationalism need take this form and if you consider the form of nationalism espoused by the SNP government it is clear that it is very inclusive, indeed the first Asian MSP (Bashir Ahmed) is an SNP MSP. Whilst it is obviously true that there are nationalists whose 'politics' are unsavoury at best there is also a group which is far more liberal in their views and who do not feel any threat from outside influence and are capable of discussing their nationalistic tendencies without recourse to, or even thought of, inflammatory rhetoric. |
||||||||||||
| agentmancuso |
I don't think all nationalists are the same. But they are all drinking from the same poisoned chalice, for all that some prefer to sup with a longer spoon.
I think you may have inadvertently answered your own question there. |
||||||||||||
| agentmancuso |
When it suits, yes. But when things turn nasty, what happens with all the resentment, bravado and tribalism that nationalism feeds on and engenders? It takes centre stage.
Yes. I take the view that it is a lie. And a dangerous one at that.
Hmm. That'll be rhetoric such as "making Westminster dance to a Scottish jig" will it? |
||||||||||||
| Lewis |
It's funny how you can alter quotes to suit your point of view. I am saying that Nationalism suits the people of Scotland at the most in my opinion. The thing that angers me is that you readily call people stupid because of their beliefs. We only have an opinion, and you have one too. But to say anyone is less intellectual than you because of opinion is to say you are right and everyone else is wrong, and that is the reason why we are so messed up now. Nationalism can be very beneficial as it pulls a society who share something in common together and it gives the society a common goal. If the common goal is to ensure the best for you people then I see no problem with that. |
||||||||||||