Archive for Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites.
 



       Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index -> Scottish Politics and Independence
Tartan Tory

President al Fayed?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article6889088.ece

It seems Mohammed al Fayed wants to be the First President on an independent Scottish republic. Thoughts?
Aventinian

Sounds like he's rather clutching at straws since the Home Office told him where to go with his citizenship application!
Dave Coull

Laughing
Laughing
Laughing
Shagpile

Aventinian wrote:
Sounds like he's rather clutching at straws since the Home Office told him where to go with his citizenship application!


Exactly my thoughts Aventinian. However, there's no reason why he could not apply for a Scottish Passport sometime in th near future, which might be a first step; depending on the constitution an independent Scotland..... who knows.

I would be inclined to vote for a republic. Yet I'd also be happy with a monarchy. It would entirely depend on the type of republic I would be asked to consider.
Stevie

Crackers.
Cruachan

My personal hopes are independence for Scotland in my lifetime, a Scottish Republic in my children's lifetime.

I think we could do a lot better than Mr Al F. Confused
magister ludi

I can understand why he feels disinclined to be a supporter of  the monarchy and so his pro-republican stance is consistent and credible. With regard  to his presidential aspirations, I suspect a psychological overlay of  a delusional nature, which goes beyond optimistic aspiration, in  that he underestimates the challenges his candidature would present to contemporary thinking about the progress and development of representative systems of government in Scotland, and indeed in the wider geo-political environment in which those options might operate.
Aventinian

magister ludi wrote:
I can understand why he feels disinclined to be a supporter of  the monarchy and so his pro-republican stance is consistent and credible.


I suspect it's largely based on his barmy belief that his son (and, according to him, future daughter in law) was murdered by the Royal Family. I'd hardly call that credible.
magister ludi

Aventinian wrote:

I suspect it's largely based on his barmy belief that his son (and, according to him, future daughter in law) was murdered by the Royal Family.


I don't disagree, nor do I have any quibble with the word "barmy", but GIVEN that HE believes it his, support for a president as head of state is credible.

Sorry, perhaps my sentence construction attributed "credible" to what we can agree to call the "barmy belief" rather than his "republican stance".
Shagpile

Aventinian wrote:
magister ludi wrote:
I can understand why he feels disinclined to be a supporter of  the monarchy and so his pro-republican stance is consistent and credible.


I suspect it's largely based on his barmy belief that his son (and, according to him, future daughter in law) was murdered by the Royal Family. I'd hardly call that credible.


Well, even the beeb did credible 'conspiracy theories' on that. Which witesses were excused attendance? Did the press report anything of that final inquest with anything other than contempt or bias? I'm sure you have links to contradict that Aventinian...... I'm just left bewildered by it all.

Dead men can't testify after all. Hmmmm.

I'm sure there's a sound explination in all that. Funny that the key benificiaries in Diana's death were the British State and the blood line of hereditary to the throne.
Shagpile

magister ludi wrote:
I don't disagree, nor do I have any quibble with the word "barmy", but GIVEN that HE believes it his, support for a president as head of state is credible.

Sorry, perhaps my sentence construction attributed "credible" to what we can agree to call the "barmy belief" rather than his "republican stance".


Perfectly amplified. I don't disagree with your former. For me..... the jury's still out on the latter.

       Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index -> Scottish Politics and Independence
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Our Scotland Hit Counter Scottish Top Site - Topsites Our Scotland Forums Critical Acclaim ~ Politically Progressive Top Sites View Site Stats Scottish Politics