 |
Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Anthropos I Love 'Our Scotland'

Joined: 15 Jul 2006 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RFM wrote: | | If the Act of Union intended the political abolition of Scotland and its merger into Great Britain as a county or territory of Great Britain it could have so stated. It did not |
You are on the right lines, but a couple of things are incorrect:
| RFM wrote: | | For instance the English maintained until 1999 a "Scottish Affairs" office at Westminister, subsequently transferred to the English Executive authority ( the Queen). The mere existence of such an office is the clear acknowledgment of a separate country whose governance is assumed by the Act of Union. |
See here for the history of that office:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary_of_State_for_Scotland
As you will see it has not been continuous.
| RFM wrote: | | The truth is Highlander in many respects Scotland is an independent country. For example if you read the Act of Union 1706/07 it merges the two countries, Scotland and England into a country known as Great Britain, it does not abolish or eliminate Scotland a political or legal entity. Further Scotland retains it own banking system, its own legal system, and to some extent its own educational system, but I am not too certain how its educational system differs. |
As I said in another post the Treaty of Union left intact the three pillars of Scottish society, you have mentioned two of them, namely Law and Education, the third was the Church. These things directly shaped the life of a Scotsman, and all three were distinctly Scottish. Scots law is based – life most European nations – on Roman law, and this differs significantly from English Law. The Presbyterian religion has little that an Anglican would recognise, and a Scots college would have been a very different experience from an Oxbridge college, as is nicely expressed by Stevenson in his essay The Foreigner at Home:
| Robert_Louis_Stevenson wrote: | | The English lad goes to Oxford or Cambridge; there, in an ideal world of gardens, to lead a semi-scenic life, costumed, disciplined and drilled by proctors. Nor is this to be regarded merely as a stage of education; it is a piece of privilege besides, and a step that separates him further from the bulk of his compatriots. At an earlier age the Scottish lad begins his greatly different experience of crowded class-rooms, of a gaunt quadrangle, of a bell hourly booming over the traffic of the city to recall him from the public-house where he has been lunching, or the streets where he has been wandering fancy-free. His college life has little of restraint, and nothing of necessary gentility. He will find no quiet clique of the exclusive, studious and cultured; no rotten borough of the arts. All classes rub shoulders on the greasy benches. The raffish young gentleman in gloves must measure his scholarship with the plain, clownish laddie from the parish school. |
http://www.readbookonline.net/read/443/9893/
The essay - written in the 19th century - is very good at describing the different characters of the two nations at that time, and demonstrates how different they were, much more so than now.
After the union Scotland remained very much a separate county, but with the economic benefits of union and Empire (which proportionately more Scots served in than Englishmen).
It was very much a marriage of convenience.
| RFM wrote: | | No Highlander, you are simply unwilling to accept the fact that the English are much smarter and cleverer. |
Can't make any sense of this claim.
_________________ Anthropos ikane prophasis eis to dustukhein |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Highlander I Love 'Our Scotland'
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RFM wrote: | | No Highlander, you are simply unwilling to accept the fact that the English are much smarter and cleverer. The Act of Union openly acknowledges and states that the two independent countries of Scotland and England are united. You for reasons I can only guess choose to think that meant the end of Scotland as a country rather than as a single independent country. The English far more clear-eyed about the existence of their country, it is and will always be England. You on the other hand go about like a person who is afraid to speak of the existence of illegitimate offspring rather than admit the Act of Union was an act of political expediency which has probably outlived its usefulness. |
It is just I have an understanding of my country. _________________ British to the end |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RFM 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 486 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
To Highlander;
Which one?
To Anthropos;
Thank-you for the references; it is extremely difficult to find references to works like Stevenson's, The Foriegner at Home, in America.
My observation about the cleverness of the English was simply that they understood the Act of Union did not eliminate or abolish England as an independent political or legal entity, yet so many individuals seem to assume that it did for Scotland. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Highlander I Love 'Our Scotland'
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
My country is Scotland and the rest of the U.K.
| Quote: | | My observation about the cleverness of the English was simply that they understood the Act of Union did not eliminate or abolish England as an independent political or legal entity, yet so many individuals seem to assume that it did for Scotland. |
So do you claim that California is America and America is just California? You claim at every point possible that the U.K. is England. So by that logic the U.S is just California. The act of union removed England as an independent soverign state and replaced it with Great Britain, the combining of Scotland and England & Wales. Why does this not compute with you? You say that "the Act of Union did not eliminate or abolish England as an independent political or legal entity" so what is your point here? Of course England is a legal entity because it has a system of law unique to it in the U.K. just as Scotland has! The U.K. has 3 different law systems English, Scottish and N.I. Your whole arguement is weak. England and Scotland are legal entities within in the U.K. Many many countries exist with mulitple legal entities within their borders. Where is the problem with that? What you do is to confuse England with the U.K all the time for some reason. It is very strange. Not even nationalists from Scotland do that, in fact they are some of the people that hate it the most when the U.K. is called England.
It isn't your fault you have a severe lack of understanding.  _________________ British to the end |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Babygael Collecting my 'Our Scotland' Pension!

Joined: 08 Apr 2006 Posts: 2352 Location: Bajan land
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Scotland is a country seperate and distinct from england.
Was the concept of the union between Scotland/england a Scots Idea?? Humnnnnn??
And if not, whose was it??
And if it was englands,Why do you suppose they came up with it?? Humnnnnnn???
Why do you think england wanted a union with us???
1) Because they loved us??
2) Because they wanted to make our lives better?
3) Because they were big brother and had an overwhelming need to protect us?
YEAH RIGHT!
Scots enjoyed what crumbs might have fallen off their (the engerlish) table these past 300 years, but we will no longer settle for crumbs,we want to sit at OUR own table and choose OUR own destiny.
To me the UK stands for Scotland/Wales/ireland/cornwall/england and IOM and so on.
The word Britain to me stands for the same except for Ireland,IOM
But it does not TELL US WHICH COUNTRY each individual comes from!
I do not support the union anymore than I support the EU.
In fact, the saying "trust the devil you know" keeps ringing in my ears!
Alba Gu Brath _________________ Ath-bheothachadh
Drink beer,don't drive...its cheeper! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RFM 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 486 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Highlander;
Go back and read your previous postings in "Scots National Anthem" where you deny there is a country known as England.
California is an independent state, one of which comprise the USA. Nobody goes around saying there is no California, only USA.
The point is that there certainly is a country known as England just as there is a country known as Scotland. The collective association of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland may be whatever you want to call it, but Scotland still exists. So does England, ask any Englishman.
You want to be an Englishman, don't be embarrassed to say so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Highlander I Love 'Our Scotland'
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The collective association of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland may be whatever you want to call it |
It is not what I want to call it, it is what it is called the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Quite simple really. Maybe still too hard for you to understand, it definitely seems that way.
| Quote: | | You want to be an Englishman, don't be embarrassed to say so |
This what I am arguing against, your complete lack of understanding of what the U.K. and British are. You think that British=English hence your statement above. And England does not exist as an independent nation/country/state or whatever you think it is just as I said in the other thread. Next you will tell me that Bavaria is an independent counrty seperate from Germany. _________________ British to the end |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RFM 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 486 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have never heard anybody from Scotland or Wales or Ireland, north or south, ever admit or claim to be "British", only those people who live south of the Tweed. Oh, and you, but you want to keep a foot on both sides of the fence, so I guess we can call you the British Scotsman. What will you call yourself if Scots independence comes to be?
Odd that you should choose Bavaria as an example. Germans certainly think it is a different place than the rest of Germany, and the Bavarians do also. In fact the Bavarians call themselves "Freistaat Bayern". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Highlander I Love 'Our Scotland'
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | What will you call yourself if Scots independence comes to be? |
Exactly what I do now. _________________ British to the end |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Highlander I Love 'Our Scotland'
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | In fact the Bavarians call themselves "Freistaat Bayern". |
No they do not! They call the country that! Get it right please. Germany is made up 16 countries as the word länder is German for country. And at least 3 have "Freistaat" in their name and a few have "Freie", so your statement is pretty irrelevant.
| Quote: | | What will you call yourself if Scots independence comes to be? |
Exactly what I do now. _________________ British to the end |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anthropos I Love 'Our Scotland'

Joined: 15 Jul 2006 Posts: 323
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| RFM wrote: | To Anthropos;
Thank-you for the references; it is extremely difficult to find references to works like Stevenson's, The Foriegner at Home, in America.
My observation about the cleverness of the English was simply that they understood the Act of Union did not eliminate or abolish England as an independent political or legal entity, yet so many individuals seem to assume that it did for Scotland. |
Not the people who negotiated the treaty of union, by ensuring that Scots Law, Religion and Education were protected and remained fundamentally Scottish they ensured that Scotland remained a separate entity.
Although ironically Scottish education hardly distinguishable from its English counterpart (they are both pretty dire), European law now trumps both Scots and English law, and religion has become an irrelevance to the majority. But despite this Scotland remains very much Scotland as England does England. _________________ Anthropos ikane prophasis eis to dustukhein |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RFM 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 486 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| You know Highlander, it is very boring exchanging remarks with you. Why don't you look at the official web site for Bavaria, www.bayern.de, down on the left side, the third entry and see what is written; who in the hell do you think they are referring to, Grossdeutchland? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RFM 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 486 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To Anthropos;
Yes both nations are composed of a very great people who have made several noteworthy contributions to the world. It will be interesting to see how the independence movement plays itself out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scottishstuart Finding Ma' Way
Joined: 17 Nov 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I luv how i posted about The Divine Right of Kings and the effects it had on the Scottish monarchs and now ur discussing, Germany and Bavaria - These threads are very strange that way.
I feel that, (and not to sound bitter towards England and it's people because I honestly have little animosity towards them) when I have been abroad, and been asked where I come from the people outside of the UK actually do believe the UK to be another name for England, in the US, in parts of Canada, my own cousin - who is canadian, but my uncle is from Glasgow, has asked if Scotland is in England,. In Australia and even Japan when I have stated I am from Scotland they have asked if thats in England. However I can understand that this is due to England being the Largest of the 4 states and the capital of GB being Englands capital London. Also that England has much more political power than the other four states - NI, Wales and Scotland have to answer to westminster regarding specific political issues.
As for the topic of wot nationality u will be when Independence occurs - Well the same option applies as it does in NI - U can be Scottish, British or have a dual nationality of Scottish/British. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Highlander I Love 'Our Scotland'
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| RFM wrote: | | You know Highlander, it is very boring exchanging remarks with you. Why don't you look at the official web site for Bavaria, www.bayern.de, down on the left side, the third entry and see what is written; who in the hell do you think they are referring to, Grossdeutchland? |
Once again RFM I am right. Bavaria is called Freistaat Bayern and I have never denied that, however, Bavarians do not refer to themselves as a country. How can a person be a country?? I am unsure what the adjective for a person that is of Bavarian origin is called in German but it certainly is not Freistaat Bayern!! _________________ British to the end |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
One O'Clock Gun No Longer a Wean

Joined: 26 Jul 2006 Posts: 65 Location: Inside a cannon
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Once again RFM I am right |
ooh, get you.
can you add modest to that list? _________________ a country with 'democratic' and 'people' in it's title, usually has scant regard for either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RFM 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 486 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder how many different "Highlanders" are writing under this name? Kindly refer back to your post of Feb. 12, wherein I write "In fact the Bavarians call themselves Freistaat Bayern".
Your reply: "No they do not".
Have you ever considered having a quiet little talk with your family doctor? You might want to ask him what the word schizophrenia means; or maybe all of you could have a talk with him.
If and when all of you do, maybe we can resume our little discussion of German history and what "Freistaat" means to the Germans. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
One O'Clock Gun No Longer a Wean

Joined: 26 Jul 2006 Posts: 65 Location: Inside a cannon
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
haven't bothered to read the previous posts of this stimulating argument, buy i had a look on
http://dict.leo.org
and the adjective for Bavarian in German is Bairisch, or bayerisch.
anyway, carry on! _________________ a country with 'democratic' and 'people' in it's title, usually has scant regard for either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Highlander I Love 'Our Scotland'
Joined: 09 Apr 2006 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="RFM"]I wonder how many different "Highlanders" are writing under this name? Kindly refer back to your post of Feb. 12, wherein I write "In fact the Bavarians call themselves Freistaat Bayern".
Your reply: "No they do not". [quote]
Yes, you said Bavrians call themselves Freistaat Bayern which is the name of the country and not the name of the people from that country. Again what I said was and is 100% right. Bavarians do not call themselves Freistaat Bayern and thanks to One O'Clock Gun we have been shown what they are called Bairisch or bayerisch. So again Bavarians do not call themselves Freistaat Bayern. It just goes to show how much difficulty you have in getting the correct noun, such as British/English/Scottish/Bavarian. _________________ British to the end |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RFM 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!
Joined: 09 Feb 2006 Posts: 486 Location: Chicago, Illinois
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is funny that you purport to know the distinction between noun and adjective but you serve up as an example a noun which you now argue is really an adjective. Translating directly from English, excuse me British, to a foreign language is always misleading.
Bayern is a noun as much as California; to say Freistaat Bayern is to say 'the Free State of Bavaria". When I wrote that the Bavarians call themselves "Freistaat Bayern" I took it for granted that only an illiterate or a person who does not speak German would not recognize the noun form. Since it was you who offered Bavaria as an example, see your post of Feb. 12, I thought you might know a little about what you were talking about. Foolish me!
But since you seem to have some recurrent memory lapses, for want of a better term, it was you who said "Next you will tell me that Bavaria is an independent country separate from Germany". My reply was then, is now, look at the name the Bavarians call themselves. I really did not think anybody would be so obtuse as to think I was referring to the appellation Bavarians use for themselves. Particularly as Freistaat Bayern is quite well known and has been since 1918.
John Kennedy in 1963 in a visit to Berlin said in a speech, "Ich bin ein Berliner". As a direct translation of English, excuse me British, he was correct. However in the German language he was saying that he was a custard filled pastry of the type found in coffee shops in Germany known as a "Berliner". A German who lived in Berlin would say "Ich bin Berliner". So no, a Bavarian does not call himself by the adjectival form. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|