| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Are the CyberNats |
| a help to the SNP? |
|
81% |
[ 9 ] |
| a hindrance for the SNP? |
|
18% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 11 |
|
| Author |
Message |
William_Cleland I really have nothing else to do!!!

Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 852
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure it is only about doing whatever is to Serbia's disadvantage, Dave. Kosovo was part of the rotating presidency post-Tito. Hence why western countries claim there is no precedent for the likes of Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh. The Tito era boundaries of Kosovo are still being respected despite the fact that a large chunk of northern Kosovo is predominantly Serb and wants no part of independence. If Belgium fell apart the Flemish nationalists in those southern suburbs you mention would have nothing to worry about as they are legally part of Flanders. We are straying a wee bit off topic so that's it from me on this particular tangent.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1997 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| William_Cleland wrote: | I wasn't really using Belgium as an example of stability and harmony and tried to imply quite the opposite with "stagger on". What's interesting (at least to me anyway) is that despite Belgium being essentially dead as a nation in that there are now very few shared institutions that meaningfully bridge the linguistic divide they still carried on with their shared decentralized state despite a crisis that reached almost farcical proportions. Sometimes there needs to be a very strong push factor to get people to summon up the energy to carry out a radical change, which from the outside would appear the logical outcome. |
Logical? Only if you happen to believe that linguistic divides correspond "logically" with administrative boundaries. Ein Volk, ein Reich.
| Quote: | | Most people see Scotland as being the national entity that they primarily identify with (although a significant minority do not) but they don't necessarily feel motivated to create an independent state on that basis. |
Indeed. Very sensible they are too. _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1997 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dave Coull wrote: | | Nationalists in charge of the local councils there are doing everything they can to prevent folk from selling or renting their houses to French speakers |
Surely you don't mean these nationalists are behaving in an openly discriminatory and xenophobic way? I thought that was supposed to be a scare story dreamed up by "the Unionist Press"? _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Coull Independentista
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 1082
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I said about those in local government of some of the suburbs of Brussels "Flemish Nationalists in charge of the local councils there are doing everything they can to prevent folk from selling or renting their houses to French speakers"
Agentmancuso says "Surely you don't mean these nationalists are behaving in an openly discriminatory and xenophobic way?"
That is exactly what I do mean.
"I thought that was supposed to be a scare story dreamed up by 'the Unionist Press'?"
Here in Scotland, you do often get scare stories dreamed up by 'the Unionist Press' which have very little basis in reality. However, even in Scotland, where "civic nationalism" tends to predominate, a small minority of nationalists are of the "openly discriminatory and xenophobic" variety, and amongst Flemish Nationalists this unpleasant form of nationalism tends to be dominant.
It would, of course, be xenophobic to suggest that the Flemings are just naturally more unpleasant. The reasons why Flemish nationalism tends to be more "openly discriminatory and xenophobic" than Scottish nationalism are to be found in differences in the geography and history of these two very different places. We're just luckier than them, in some ways. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1997 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Of course, it had inexplicably slipped my mind - it's all those other guys that are the Bad Nationalists, whereas we, being cut from an altogether better cloth, are blessed with the Good Nationalists. _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
George This is Ma' Life!
Joined: 02 May 2006 Posts: 622
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bandying words with the bigots and intolerant Unionist fanatics who attempt to slur many decent Scots is a waste of valuable time.
Here are a few phrases from the pantomime villain stand in:
| Quote: | worshippers of the Fatherland
Ein Volk, ein Reich.
discriminatory and xenophobic |
It took a while to realise that these people aren't interested in debate, they are out to provoke.
Observing them screaming "racists" from behind a metaphorical white cone mask is irony at it's best..........poke fun at them, they get awfully irked, but don't take them seriously guys. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lewis No Longer a Wean
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| agentmancuso wrote: | | Of course, it had inexplicably slipped my mind - it's all those other guys that are the Bad Nationalists, whereas we, being cut from an altogether better cloth, are blessed with the Good Nationalists. |
To put all Nationalists under one banner is to put all right-wingers under one banner and to put all left wingers under one banner. To do so would be terribly ignorant. _________________ Hammish Independence |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1997 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lewis wrote: | | To put all Nationalists under one banner is to put all right-wingers under one banner and to put all left wingers under one banner. To do so would be terribly ignorant. |
Are you sure? Wouldn't it be a plausible taxonomical solution to put all 'right-wingers' under the 'right wing' banner. And all 'left-wingers' under the 'left-wing' banner? And even, hey ho, all nationalists under the 'nationalist' banner?
After all, all nationalisms share the same set of ludicrous assumptions. _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alasdair 'Our Scotland' = 2nd Job!

Joined: 01 May 2008 Posts: 433 Location: Clydesdale
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| agentmancuso wrote: | | After all, all nationalisms share the same set of ludicrous assumptions. |
These being? _________________ "We look to Scotland for all our ideas of civilisation." - Voltaire |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1997 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Alasdair wrote: | | These being? |
All nationalism is predicated on the following:
1) the existence of an essential political entity
2) the existence of an external threat to the cohesion of this entity
3) the existence of a debt of allegiance to this political entity necessitating the taking of urgent steps to defend the cohesion of this entity.
Utter fantasy of course. And it inevitably expresses itself in the same tired old populist ways:
1) They're stealing all our taxes
2) They're dissolving our legal system
3) They're damaging our cultural integrity
4) They don't care about us, it's just a faceless (foreign) bureaucracy
(Regular readers, please forgive the copy & paste..) _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender I need ma own bl**dy forum!
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1355 Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Utter fantasy indeed, and agentmancuso is the fantasist.
These are his phrases, he is the one who posts them. It's a not very good straw man argument; he makes up his own fantasy nationalists and then argues against them rather than the real people in the real world.
What colour is the sky on your planet, agentmancuso? _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1997 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Argue the actual points, if you're up to it. _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender I need ma own bl**dy forum!
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1355 Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What points? Make some which bear a passing resemblance to reality and I might argue them. Otherwise I won't waste my time, or anybody else's. _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1997 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
These points:
| Quote: |
All nationalism is predicated on the following:
1) the existence of an essential political entity
2) the existence of an external threat to the cohesion of this entity
3) the existence of a debt of allegiance to this political entity necessitating the taking of urgent steps to defend the cohesion of this entity. |
Can you name any nationalism which does not conform to this simple definition? _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender I need ma own bl**dy forum!
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1355 Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You seriously want an answer?
Scottish nationalism is not predicated on points 2 and 3. Game over, what a bore.
Now... why don't you go and play with the other children and leave the grown ups alone. _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1997 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Holebender wrote: | | Scottish nationalism is not predicated on points 2 and 3. |
2. So you accept that absolutely no threat to Scotland's economic, financial, cultural, linguistic, social or political welfare is presented by continued participation in the Union?
3. So you have lost your urgent enthusiasm for anti-democratic populist gimmicks like referendums on 'independence'?
| Quote: | | Now... why don't you go and play with the other children and leave the grown ups alone. |
That really does smack of desperation. _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lewis No Longer a Wean
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
You seem to have the thought that you are right and everyone else is wrong. What you sir have is an opinion, what we have also is an opinion, you must understand that no matter how much you flash your three points at us we sill not change our opinion. _________________ Hammish Independence |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1997 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't ask you, or anyone else, to change their opinion. I asked them to justify it. Do you disagree that all nationalisms are based on the identical assumptions outlined above? _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
William_Cleland I really have nothing else to do!!!

Joined: 22 Apr 2007 Posts: 852
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| agentmancuso wrote: | | William_Cleland wrote: | I wasn't really using Belgium as an example of stability and harmony and tried to imply quite the opposite with "stagger on". What's interesting (at least to me anyway) is that despite Belgium being essentially dead as a nation in that there are now very few shared institutions that meaningfully bridge the linguistic divide they still carried on with their shared decentralized state despite a crisis that reached almost farcical proportions. Sometimes there needs to be a very strong push factor to get people to summon up the energy to carry out a radical change, which from the outside would appear the logical outcome. |
Logical? Only if you happen to believe that linguistic divides correspond "logically" with administrative boundaries. Ein Volk, ein Reich. |
I have to question your intelligence after that. If there are no political parties that bridge the linguistic divide and if it takes half a year to form a government, it's probably time to call it a day. The state clearly isn't working so the logical perspective from the outside would be that it is time to try another arrangement. Nowhere in that analysis is there a suggestion that Switzerland should split four ways because unlike the Belgians the Swiss have been able to make it work. Trivialising the legacy of Nazism to make petty playground level jibes like that is pathetic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lewis No Longer a Wean
Joined: 21 Feb 2008 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | 1) the existence of an essential political entity
2) the existence of an external threat to the cohesion of this entity
3) the existence of a debt of allegiance to this political entity necessitating the taking of urgent steps to defend the cohesion of this entity. |
1) You didn't specify about the political entity, is this a party, a nation or a country? People are affiliated to all sorts of things but aren't nationalists.
2) Constructive Nationalism doesn't judge the outside as a threat therefore this would apply to a lot of left-wing, centre-right and centrist Nationalist movements. But in most Destructive nationalist regimes yes this would apply.
3)the "debt of alliegance" in Constructive nationalism is a choice. But a lot of people feel affiliated with their nation anyway. The benefit of this is the fact that the nation can have a common goal which they can work to achieve. But there are anarchist movements which involve one "political entity" which no doubt wouldn't have the pledge of alliegance.
So it does apply to most Destructive Nationalist Regimes, but not to most Constructive natioanlist regimes. _________________ Hammish Independence |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|