| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Morph Our Scotland = 2nd Job!

Joined: 19 Jan 2006 Posts: 916
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
But Luke thats the point- poll tax is the perfect example, if you look at the Lothian question you would think that poor English MPs are being strong handed by an unseen Scottish mafia in London.
_________________ "An oppressive government is to be more feared than a tiger" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alasdair Our Scotland = 2nd Job!

Joined: 01 May 2008 Posts: 1021
Location: Clydesdale
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Luke P wrote: | | It's not pish. The PM, chancellor and Home Sec are Scots - the three most important posts in the land. The speaker was a Scot also, till a wee while ago. Holyrood business is Holyrood business and English MPs have no say in Scotland. In national business yes they do, but you are just pointing out the demographic imbalance between England and Scotland. That can't be rectified until Scotland welcomes 20m immigrants or half of England dies of swine flu. In any case, when did MPs vote along English and Scottish lines EVER???? |
It is utter rubbish. The parliamentary arithmetic means that English MP's will always have a majority voice, and clearly given the different institutions north and south of the border and regional priorities it is highly likely that voting intentions will vary accordingly.
Maybe if MP's had more backbone and the whip less power it would be more obvious. But to say that Westminster and the country is run by Scots is utter tosh. _________________ My blog - http://manaboutthehouse.wordpress.com
My arts and crafts site http://madestuff.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 2752
Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Luke P wrote: | | In any case, when did MPs vote along English and Scottish lines EVER???? |
So why bother pointing out the origins of the holders of any given office at any given time? _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead 'Our Scotland' Fossil
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 4295
Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wholeheartedly agree with you Alasdair.
There are insufficient numbers of Scots, Welsh and N Irland MP's combined, to make any impact on what the majority of MP's (English) do or say Westminster is ruled by English MP's, and always has been. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Luke P Gaining a Reputation

Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 218
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's just demographics! 84% of the UK population live within the delimitations of the river Tweed and Offa's Dyke, referred to by some as 'England', the inhabitants' demonym being 'English'. These people have a right to 84% of the representation in parliament. They don't have it - they have about 81% of it. Fair enough - I'm not complaining. Personally I wouldn't have objected to reducing it a little more to reflect the greater per capita landmass of Scotland, but after devolution it is pointless and unfair.
On what basis can any minority grouping claim foul play for not being dominant? That would be a complete perversion of democracy and logic.
The East Anglians could be up in arms that their votes don't decide anything... as could the Northumbrians... or the people in my village... etc. (these latter groups, of course, not enjoying he luxury of home rule). Blacks could say white MPs always decide everything, but it wouldn't be right to have a black majority parliament when only 2% of the people are black; less so when there is a 'black parliament' to deal with black business outside Croydon. (for example)
Parliament is divided along party lines, not 'national' lines. Any notion of a pan-English political agenda in Westminster is nonsense (although it could emerge over the West Lothian question) as is any notion of a cohesive pan-Englishness although that may be forced by separatisms. The notion that any given Scottish MP represents you - because you are Scottish - is similarly nonsense. My local MP (in England) is Scottish but does as bad a job as anyone of representing me - actually he's quite decent for a Tory.
(you are right tho that the whips need got rid of)
Last edited by Luke P on Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:42 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Luke P Gaining a Reputation

Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 218
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Holebender wrote: | | Luke P wrote: | | In any case, when did MPs vote along English and Scottish lines EVER???? |
So why bother pointing out the origins of the holders of any given office at any given time? |
Because it's exactly the argument nationalists use all the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alasdair Our Scotland = 2nd Job!

Joined: 01 May 2008 Posts: 1021
Location: Clydesdale
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Luke P wrote: | | Holebender wrote: | | Luke P wrote: | | In any case, when did MPs vote along English and Scottish lines EVER???? |
So why bother pointing out the origins of the holders of any given office at any given time? |
Because it's exactly the argument nationalists use all the time. |
What?! That the Scots run the uk ... I don't think it is [used by s-nats] _________________ My blog - http://manaboutthehouse.wordpress.com
My arts and crafts site http://madestuff.co.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Luke P Gaining a Reputation

Joined: 03 Jul 2009 Posts: 218
|
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Alasdair wrote: | | Luke P wrote: | | Holebender wrote: | | Luke P wrote: | | In any case, when did MPs vote along English and Scottish lines EVER???? |
So why bother pointing out the origins of the holders of any given office at any given time? |
Because it's exactly the argument nationalists use all the time. |
What?! That the Scots run the uk ... I don't think it is [used by s-nats] |
You misunderstand. The argument is that there are not enough Scottish MPs at Westminster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 2752
Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Who argues that? Nationalists argue that there are too many Scottish MPs in Westminster; 59 too many! _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead 'Our Scotland' Fossil
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 4295
Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Back on topic for a moment.
The words to Flower of Scotland are quite stirring, it's the singing of it by a large crowd that turns it in to a dirge. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stevie Independentist

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 1179
|
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The words to 'Scots Wha Hae', by Robert Burns are stirring but the SNP sing it like it's a funeral march.
It's a marching tune, legend has it played as Bruce marched on the field of Bannockburn.
Scots Wha Hae
Scots, wha hae wi' Wallace bled,
Scots wham Bruce has often led,
Welcome to your gorie bed,
Or to Victorie!
Now's the day, and now's the hour;
See the front o' battle lour,
See approach proud Edward's pow'r
Chains and slaverie!
Wha will be a traitor knave?
Wha can fill a coward's grave?
Wha sae base as be a slave?
Let him turn and flee!
Wha, for Scotland's King and Law,
Freedom's sword will strongly draw,
Freeman stand, or Freeman fa',
Let him on wi, me!
By Oppression's woes and pains!
By your sons in servile chains!
We will drain our dearest veins,
But they shall be free!
Lay the proud Usurpers low!
Tyrants fall in every foe!
Liberty's in every blow!
Let us do or die!
ROBERT BURNS _________________ Every man dies, not every man really lives.
Alba gu brąth! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead 'Our Scotland' Fossil
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 4295
Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Aye legend may have it that way, but it wasn't written for hundreds of years after Bannockburn.
I agree though, that like FoS it also gets turned into a dirge. Mind you the biggest dirge of all has to be GStQ.
A good marching and inoffensive song in my opinion is Scotland the Brave. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stevie Independentist

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 1179
|
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeh, but it wasn't written by Robert Burns.
You say that the tune wasn't written 'for hundreds of years afterwards', where did you find that info? _________________ Every man dies, not every man really lives.
Alba gu brąth! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead 'Our Scotland' Fossil
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 4295
Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well It's my understanding that it was written By Robert Burns, long after Bannockburn.It is certainly included in his works in the old book of the complete works and songs of Robert Burns which I havejust checked, and the correct title is "Bruce's Address to his Army at Bannockburn. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 2752
Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Large numbers of Burns' songs are reworked and improved versions of earlier folk songs. They all carry Burns' name because of the work he did collecting the original songs and giving the benefit of his poetic genius but most were in existence in some form long before Burns. _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stevie Independentist

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 1179
|
Posted: Fri Jul 17, 2009 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was referring to the music, 'Hey tooti tooti' (I think that's the spelling) is the music reputedly played at Bannockburn. _________________ Every man dies, not every man really lives.
Alba gu brąth! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Coull Independentista
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2809
|
Posted: Sat Jul 18, 2009 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bravehand wrote: | | I was referring to the music, 'Hey tooti tooti' (I think that's the spelling) is the music reputedly played at Bannockburn. | Aye, as I understand it, the tune is several centuries older than Burns's words, and yes, there is a tradition going back centuries that it was the tune played as Bruce's troops marched to battle at Bannockburn. Although it might be difficult to conclusively prove this, it's a well-established tradition, about a tune that is many centuries old. And that would make it a marching song, with a considerably faster pace than the usual dirge-like modern rendition. Also, Burns's words are based on a tradition about Robert Bruce's pep talk to his troops immediately before the Battle of Bannockburn. The order of the words is Burns's, the rhyming of the words is Burns's, but there is a good chance that the sentiments really are Bruce's. Ancient traditional marching tune, Robert Bruce's words, reworked by Robert Burns, no other patriotic song has quite such an impressive pedigree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stevie Independentist

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 1179
|
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aye David. _________________ Every man dies, not every man really lives.
Alba gu brąth! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 1 Strike
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 5558
Location: Oh, I get about a bit.
|
Posted: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mairead wrote: | I wholeheartedly agree with you Alasdair.
There are insufficient numbers of Scots, Welsh and N Irland MP's combined, to make any impact on what the majority of MP's (English) do or say Westminster is ruled by English MP's, and always has been. |
What utter rot. Is the UK ruled by white people? Is the UK ruled by heterosexuals? How about Christians?
No, of course not. The personal identity of an MP has no baring on his job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
babykitten Activist
Joined: 21 Aug 2007 Posts: 150
|
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Aventinian wrote: | | mairead wrote: | I wholeheartedly agree with you Alasdair.
There are insufficient numbers of Scots, Welsh and N Irland MP's combined, to make any impact on what the majority of MP's (English) do or say Westminster is ruled by English MP's, and always has been. |
What utter rot. Is the UK ruled by white people? Is the UK ruled by heterosexuals? How about Christians?
No, of course not. The personal identity of an MP has no baring on his job. |
An unfortunate typo given the behaviour of countless MPs over the years.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|