Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org
Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Iran
Page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index -> Global Politics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Holebender
Ready For Afterlife!


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 2752


Location: Here or There

PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Idiot. That's directed at landg, as he seems to have difficulty figuring out who is being addressed by which remarks.



_________________
"My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
landg
This is Ma' Life!


Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 617


Location: awaiting approval by a mod/admin

PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

davey neees to more specific, he just spoke about the ignorance and bigotry of lumping a whole group of people togther. as wholebender did with the uk.
waas it about lumping the uk or arabs/muslims together dvd?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Dave Coull
Independentista


Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 2809



PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"landg" wrote, about something I had written
Quote:
i take it thats directed at holebender
No, it wasn't.
landg wrote:
he just jumped the wholeof the uk together
Really? You surprise me. Holebender never struck me as a Unionist. But if Holebender did in fact make some such comment, I never noticed it, and I wasn't referring to anything he had said.
jamesieboy wrote:
the Arab regimes (Iran is Persian with an Arab minority in the south)
a comment which I considered potentially misleading, and I explained   why  I considered it potentially misleading.
landg wrote:
davey neees to more specific, he just spoke about the ignorance and bigotry of lumping a whole group of people togther
No, I didn't just speak "about the ignorance and bigotry of lumping a whole group of people togther". I gave specific examples. I wrote
Quote:
it is both ignorant and racist to lump all arabs together, and it is both ignorant and bigoted to lump all muslims together.
But, although, on this particular occasion, I was being specific, it's true that, as a general principle, I think it's a mistake to lump together people who may in fact be very different, and who may have very different views. For example, it's a mistake to make sweeping general statements about "protesteers".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
landg
This is Ma' Life!


Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 617


Location: awaiting approval by a mod/admin

PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave Coull wrote:
"landg" wrote, about something I had written
Quote:
i take it thats directed at holebender
No, it wasn't.
landg wrote:
he just jumped the wholeof the uk together
Really? You surprise me. Holebender never struck me as a Unionist. But if Holebender did in fact make some such comment, I never noticed it, and I wasn't referring to anything he had said.
jamesieboy wrote:
the Arab regimes (Iran is Persian with an Arab minority in the south)
a comment which I considered potentially misleading, and I explained   why  I considered it potentially misleading.
landg wrote:
davey neees to more specific, he just spoke about the ignorance and bigotry of lumping a whole group of people togther
No, I didn't just speak "about the ignorance and bigotry of lumping a whole group of people togther". I gave specific examples. I wrote
Quote:
it is both ignorant and racist to lump all arabs together, and it is both ignorant and bigoted to lump all muslims together.
But, although, on this particular occasion, I was being specific, it's true that, as a general principle, I think it's a mistake to lump together people who may in fact be very different, and who may have very different views. For example, it's a mistake to make sweeping general statements about "protesteers".


or the UK?.................
specififcs daved, specifics and it gives an excuse to make your posts even more exhausting. i'll probably regret saying that nwo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Dave Coull
Independentista


Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 2809



PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

landg wrote:
or the UK?.................specififcs daved
I realise expressing yourself in English is difficult, with Gibberish being your first language, but, if you would care to re-phrase that as a question which makes some sense, I will try to answer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
landg
This is Ma' Life!


Joined: 05 Aug 2009
Posts: 617


Location: awaiting approval by a mod/admin

PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave Coull wrote:
landg wrote:
or the UK?.................specififcs daved
I realise expressing yourself in English is difficult, with Gibberish being your first language, but, if you would care to re-phrase that as a question which makes some sense, I will try to answer.


you, the man who was happy to be interviewd by the NOTW, is getting all pompous and grammar and spelling.
daved, your irnoy and waffle know's no bounds.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Stevie
Independentist


Joined: 22 Nov 2008
Posts: 1179



PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

landg wrote:
happy to be interviewd by the NOTW, is getting all pompous and grammar and spelling.
daved, your irnoy and waffle know's no bounds.


It would be amusing if it weren't for the fact that, based on previous posts, this could well be a normal landg sentence.

Of course, certain substances could lie at the heart of this innovative spelling/grammatical form landg is developing.
_________________
Every man dies, not every man really lives.

Alba gu brąth!


Last edited by Stevie on Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:39 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fidget
Standing in a Council Ward


Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 556



PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stevie wrote:


It would be amusing if it weren't for the fact that...


"wasn't".  Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dave Coull
Independentista


Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 2809



PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

landg wrote:
or the UK?.................specififcs daved
and since, despite using a question mark, "landg" had forgotten to actually ask a question, I wrote
Quote:
if you would care to re-phrase that as a question which makes some sense, I will try to answer.
It turns out "landg" didn't really have a question about the subject of this thread, nor about any related topic, he just wanted to have a "go" at me personally
landg wrote:
happy to be interviewd by the NOTW
Even the NOTW said I wasn't happy about talking to them, that was about the only thing they got right. Not one single thing they "quoted" was something I actually said, they just made it up. However, lifting ourselves back up out of the gutter, it is ridiculously inaccurate to count Iran as an "Arab" country; it is both ignorant and racist to lump all Arabs together; and it is both ignorant and bigoted to lump all muslims together. That makes about as much sense as saying "Christians are......." and basing what you've got to say about Christians on what you once saw at an Old Firm match. As a general principle, I think it's a mistake to lump together people who may in fact be very different, and who may have very different views.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Dave Coull
Independentista


Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 2809



PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stevie wrote:
It would be amusing if it weren't for the fact that...
Fidget wrote:
"wasn't"
There's no need to correct Stevie, Fidget, he was using inversion of a conditional tense of the verb "to be" in a conditional sentence. The BBC "Learning English" programme gives, as an example of correct usage, "Were it not for your kindness, I'd still be living in that tiny bed-sit in the town centre".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Fidget
Standing in a Council Ward


Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 556



PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Weren't" was wrong. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dave Coull
Independentista


Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 2809



PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fidget wrote:
"Weren't" was wrong. Laughing
Okay maybe it was. I don't think it's worth arguing over. Regardless of whether what Stevie said was grammatically correct or not, at least it was coherent. There are some advantages to staying off the drugs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Stevie
Independentist


Joined: 22 Nov 2008
Posts: 1179



PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fidget, 'wasn't' is typical spoken English, not correct English in the written language (or spoken either for that matter).  It's correct to use the preterit modal form of the verb when employed in a conditional sentence expressing a possibility or a desire (etc...).

e.g. If I were you, I'd read again Dave's explanation of the conditional mode in English grammar.

It's probably best not to try and correct an English teacher's grammar if you're a tad unsure yourself.

However, there is hope.  I can recommend books to get you started, 'The Very Hungry Caterpillar' and since it's Halloween, 'Meg and Mog'.

Actually, one doesn't usually comment on silly typos and this and that spelling error but as I said landg has a history of impenetrable posts that he swears gives him 'power'.

How 'power' can be equated with entirely incoherent sentences remains to be seen.


He fidgetith here, he fidgetith there, he fidgetith almost everywhere.
_________________
Every man dies, not every man really lives.

Alba gu brąth!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Holebender
Ready For Afterlife!


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 2752


Location: Here or There

PostPosted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 11:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

landg wrote:
davey neees to more specific, he just spoke about the ignorance and bigotry of lumping a whole group of people togther. as wholebender did with the uk.
waas it about lumping the uk or arabs/muslims together dvd?

Alright, I've let this go on long enough; tell us where I am alleged to have committed this heinous crime. Let's see a quote, tell us the thread, chapter and verse.
_________________
"My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stevie
Independentist


Joined: 22 Nov 2008
Posts: 1179



PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Careful now, you might not understand his answer.

He's got the power.
_________________
Every man dies, not every man really lives.

Alba gu brąth!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Holebender
Ready For Afterlife!


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 2752


Location: Here or There

PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't understand the allegation, so it'll be no great loss if I don't understand the response. An answer is probably too much to hope for.
_________________
"My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stevie
Independentist


Joined: 22 Nov 2008
Posts: 1179



PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe a supercomputer is busy designing another supercomputer to one day translate the mysticism that is landg's powerful answers into a form that lesser mortals can perhaps comprehend... but it's by no means certain that such an undertaking is possible.





42
_________________
Every man dies, not every man really lives.

Alba gu brąth!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dave Coull
Independentista


Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 2809



PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stevie wrote:
42
What was the question again?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
magister ludi
Gaining a Reputation


Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Posts: 225



PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stevie wrote:

However, there is hope.  I can recommend books to get you started, 'The Very Hungry Caterpillar' and since it's Halloween, 'Meg and Mog'.




All of which reminds me of  something Winnie the Pooh said:

“My spelling is wobbly. It is good spelling but it wobbles, and the letters get in the wrong places.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Stevie
Independentist


Joined: 22 Nov 2008
Posts: 1179



PostPosted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dave Coull wrote:
Stevie wrote:
42
What was the question again?


I'm afraid in order to understand the question we'll have to get the 2nd generation computer to design a 3rd and possibly even a  4th generation computer.

I suspect Winnie may have better written expression skills than landg or the grammatically challenged Fidget.



_________________
Every man dies, not every man really lives.

Alba gu brąth!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index -> Global Politics All times are GMT
Page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Our Scotland Hit Counter Scottish Top Site - Topsites Our Scotland Forums Critical Acclaim ~ Politically Progressive Top Sites View Site Stats Scottish Politics