Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org
Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Scots 'supported' union signing
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index -> History
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Highlander
I Love 'Our Scotland'


Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 298

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
So in effect, everytime the Brits sing the anthem, they are singing a Jacobite hymn


The song is now for every Monarch, Queen or King. So it is NOT a Jacobite anthem. It never was.

_________________
British to the end
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mairead
Collecting my 'Our Scotland' Pension!


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 2271
Location: Argyll, Alba

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 2:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Highlander,
Sorry, but the law which states that only Protestants can rule was NOT made by the people. It was made because the Protestant noble factions in Westminster who feared a return of the days of Bloody Mary Tudor, (Daughter of Henry V111) when hundreds of protestants were burned at the stake on her orders, for their religious beliefs.
James V11 was never deposed by the Scots either, nor did he abdicate. He was forced to flee for his life as his second wife had given birth to a son, James, Prince of Wales, (Father of Charles Edward Stewart) six weeks before the arrival of William of Orange and the Protestant Parliament saw the birth as the beginning of a Catholic Dynasty.
Again, you are wrong my friend, God Save the Queen WAS a Jacobite Hymn for King James, but if you refuse to accept fact then I am not going to argue the point. Believe what you will.
However. if you are proud of being British I suggest you read up on Scottish history as well as English, and I am afrraid that being British is now on the way out.
A True Scot to the end, never British.
_________________
I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Highlander
I Love 'Our Scotland'


Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 298

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Sorry, but the law which states that only Protestants can rule was NOT made by the people. It was made because the Protestant noble factions in Westminster


The act of 1704 was made in the Scottish parliament where westminster had no say! The majority of Scots were and are protestant and wouldn't have wanted a Catholic King back then.


Quote:
Again, you are wrong my friend, God Save the Queen WAS a Jacobite Hymn for King James


Hmm funny that. Considering that in 1745 it was first sung, after the defeat at battle at Preston Pans, for King George II. That makes me find it hard to believe that it is a Jacobite anthem. Why would they sing it in London for King George II? Oh they didn't, once again I am right.
_________________
British to the end
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mairead
Collecting my 'Our Scotland' Pension!


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 2271
Location: Argyll, Alba

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry pal, Wrong again. It was first sung after the 1715 by the Jacobites. Probably it's first national airing in England was after Geordie altered it in the wake of Cumberlands slaughter at and after Culloden.
_________________
I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Highlander
I Love 'Our Scotland'


Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 298

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Give me one reference to it being used in 1715. You can look up numerous history books to see that it was 1st used in 1745 and it was published in a book in 1744.
_________________
British to the end
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mairead
Collecting my 'Our Scotland' Pension!


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 2271
Location: Argyll, Alba

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are probably right enough as to when it was first published and sung openly, but it was written by and sung by the Jacobites long before then. Many Jacobite songs were, like their meetings and by necessity, only sung in secret and in the company of Jacobites. I will find the old book where my information came from and pass you the title as soon as I can.
_________________
I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Highlander
I Love 'Our Scotland'


Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Posts: 298

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Many Jacobite songs were, like their meetings and by necessity, only sung in secret and in the company of Jacobites


That will make it all the more hard for you to prove that it was sung before 1744/1745. Good luck to you.
_________________
British to the end
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mairead
Collecting my 'Our Scotland' Pension!


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 2271
Location: Argyll, Alba

PostPosted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 7:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Highlander,
You will find the information in a book called 'The Romance of the White Rose' which was written in the 19th century.
No proof by the way, does not mean something did not happen. There is much which is known yet cannot be proved.
_________________
I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
FALSYDE
Nationalist


Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 144
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland I do dable a wee bit in history and I cannot for the life of me understand where this man Whatley could even get to first base with his thesis that the Scots were in favour of the Union, what about the riots reported by Defoe? what about the actual listings of the precise amounts of money paid and to whom paid?

To quote another respondent, this is pure boll..........s. I would doubt if his university tenure could, would or should survive this nonsense.

Come on Nail, lay it out in detail for the daft laddie in Dundee.
_________________
Iain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
SLG
Born Again..........and still Scottish!


Joined: 16 Sep 2005
Posts: 5515
Location: Dùn Eideann

PostPosted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think Whatley actually says that the Scots supported the Union - that's just headline grabbing. I think he says that many of the Scots ruling class supported the Union.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Anthropos
I Love 'Our Scotland'


Joined: 15 Jul 2006
Posts: 323

PostPosted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mairead wrote:
Yes I read that article and what a load of twaddle it is for several reasons. 1. The nobles who signed for the Act were not an elected body and all of
them received payments for their votes.
2. Many other Nobles voted against it.
3. The people of Scotland were never consulted and consequently there
was outbreaks of rioting all across the country when the news came
out.
The Scots did not want the union, only a number of greedy nobles who sought more power and accepted sums of English gold voted for it.


I think it worth pointing out that the people of England did not vote for it either!

As in Scotland it was done by the nobility sitting in their parliament.
_________________
Anthropos ikane prophasis eis to dustukhein
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mairead
Collecting my 'Our Scotland' Pension!


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 2271
Location: Argyll, Alba

PostPosted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

probably right enough Anthropos, Just like today, what the people want and what they get are often two different things, although these days there are at least elections which put some people in power and not just accident of birth as it was then.
_________________
I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
agentmancuso
Getting on a bit!


Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 1798
Location: Darkest Lanarkshire

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mairead wrote:
these days there are at least elections which put some people in power and not just accident of birth as it was then.


How does that square with your belief in the divine right of kings?
_________________
Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mairead
Collecting my 'Our Scotland' Pension!


Joined: 08 Mar 2006
Posts: 2271
Location: Argyll, Alba

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And just where exactly did I say I believed in the divine right of Kings????
_________________
I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
agentmancuso
Getting on a bit!


Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 1798
Location: Darkest Lanarkshire

PostPosted: Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mairead wrote:
And just where exactly did I say I believed in the divine right of Kings????


Here.

mairead wrote:

You are absolutely correct in saying that this was not a battle between the Scots and English. It was a battle between supporters of the rightful king, a Catholic and a Protestant usurper.


The 'ursurper' was invited by parliament. Parliament had deposed the previous king, James VII & II, because he was unsuitable. James is only the 'rightful king' if you believe that royal blood puts you beyond the reach of the law as laid down in parliament. James supporters, the Jacobites or Tories as they were known, believed he had been chosen by God, so could not be removed by popular demand. So either you also believe in the divine right of kings, or your claim that James was the 'rightful king' is meaningless.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
makar
Finding Ma' Way


Joined: 01 Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Location: BC Canada

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 2:30 am    Post subject: 1707 Reply with quote

I'll post something on the anthem later - but for now, a question: can anyone give me details / chapter and verse / background etc. on the English force lying in wait in case the Scots DIDN'T sign? Above the leader is said to be Wade, which is wrong of course; but who was it??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Jimbo
This is Ma' Life!


Joined: 18 Feb 2007
Posts: 623

PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2007 8:14 pm    Post subject: Re: 1707 Reply with quote

makar wrote:
I'll post something on the anthem later - but for now, a question: can anyone give me details / chapter and verse / background etc. on the English force lying in wait in case the Scots DIDN'T sign? Above the leader is said to be Wade, which is wrong of course; but who was it??


The Duke of Marlborough was in command of England's army at the time of The Great Debate. In 1705, Marlborough was in Flanders fighting the Spanish wars of Succession but the Scots were left in no doubt that they would suffer invasion by England's greatest captain (Marlborough) and his veterans on their return from the continent should they refuse the treaty. Gordon Donaldson wrote "the scanty ill-trained Scottish Regiments could not have resisted Marlborough's veterans".

1705.

24 warships fitted out to prevent the Scots dealing with France.

26th November, 1706.

Sir David Nairne in London wrote to the Earl of Mar advising him that "The troops on the boarders are three regiments of foot, and in the North of Ireland three of horse, one of foot and one of dragoons, and they have the necessary orders; but all relating to this affaire must be kept very private".

10th December, 1706.

Sir David Nairne in London again wrote to the Earl of Mar advising him that a further 800 horse had marched to the border on the instructions of Marlborough "for he thinks they will be more useful than thrice there number of foot".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Forum Index -> History All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Our Scotland Hit Counter 'Top Scottish Websites' - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Top Site - Topsites Top 100 Scottish Websites Our Scotland Forums Critical Acclaim ~ Politically Progressive Top Sites Tartan Army Topsites View Site Stats Our Scotland Blog Scottish Politics Scottish Lads