 |
Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mairead Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 2902 Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:50 pm Post subject: Scottish history to be taught |
|
|
Saw on tonights news that Scottish history is now to be brought back as a main part of the history curriculum in schools, although British and world history will also be taught.
_________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 4210 Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You make it sound regrettable that British and world history is to be taught...
Personally, I think Scottish history is probably taught too much at the present moment. Ask your average early primary school child who William Wallace and Robert the Bruce are, and they'll probably give you a good answer. Lord Nelson, the Duke of Wellington, Queen Boudica etc are more likely to draw blank stares.
Really, the only piece of British history that seems to be taught to the same level relates to the Second World War. _________________ The resident pantomime villain.
'Socialists cry "Power to the people", and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean—power over people, power to the State.' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 2902 Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And ask their English counterparts, and most English adults, just about anything regarding Scottish history and you'll get only blank stares. Most Scottish schools teach more English and British history than they do Scottish.
It was only with the release of the Braveheart film, which was more of a romanticised version, that any Scottish children, not to mention many adults, discovered they had a history of their own.
Everyone. no matter which country they hail from, should know who they are and from where they came, and that includes the English.
Why should the Scots be made more aware of Nelson, Wellington, English Kings and Queens and English battles than they are of those people who formed the history of their own country. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1812 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mairead wrote: | | And ask their English counterparts, and most English adults, just about anything regarding Scottish history and you'll get only blank stares. |
I doubt many Scottish children know anything about pre-Union English history either.
| Quote: | | Most Scottish schools teach more English and British history than they do Scottish. |
Scottish schools teach no English history whatsoever. Unless you think that 'English' and 'British' mean the same thing?
| Quote: |
It was only with the release of the Braveheart film, which was more of a romanticised version, that any Scottish children, not to mention many adults, discovered they had a history of their own. |
I am surprised than any Scottish children discovered a history of their own in Braveheart. Your own history begins the day you are born, not 800 years ago. In any case, if the average Scot is so pig-ignorant that he turns to Holywood blockbusters to discover anything then it's pointless discussing Scottish education at all.
| Quote: | | Everyone. no matter which country they hail from, should know who they are and from where they came, |
All they have to do is look at their birth certificate.
| Quote: | | and that includes the English. |
Even them?!?
| Quote: | | Why should the Scots be made more aware of Nelson, Wellington, English Kings and Queens and English battles than they are of those people who formed the history of their own country. |
Nelson and Wellington are British figures. No Scottish child learns anything about any English king, queen or battle in school. Unfortunately. _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 4210 Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mairead wrote: | | It was only with the release of the Braveheart film, which was more of a romanticised version, that any Scottish children, not to mention many adults, discovered they had a history of their own. |
Really? Because I went to school before those days and I was taught about who William Wallace and Robert the Bruce were.
As for the rest, you appear to be confusing British history with English.
| agentmancuso wrote: | Scottish schools teach no English history whatsoever. Unless you think that 'English' and 'British' mean the same thing? |
Agreed. Although admittedly English history is very tied in with Scottish: it'd be impossible to teach Scottish history without reference to Elizabeth I, Edward I and II etc. _________________ The resident pantomime villain.
'Socialists cry "Power to the people", and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean—power over people, power to the State.' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 2902 Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Then you are both exceptions if you in fact went to Scottish schools.
My own history education was all English history, not even British. Magna Carta, Hastings, Henry 8th, King Alfred, Boadicea and the Romans in England etc etc..
No mention of Wallace, Bannockburn, King Alexander, king David, No Scottish battles mentioned.
As for your sarcastic, meant to be clever, comment about birth certificates Agent, that about sums up your intelligence I think. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender I need ma own bl**dy forum!
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1246 Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nelson was a British figure? Really? How did that famous signal go again... oh yes... "England expects..."
My history education was more like Mairead's than Aventinian's or Agentmancuso's and I'd wager if you were to survey a cross-section of Scottish children you'd find more who could tell you what happened in 1066 and what the Magna Carta was than could tell you what happened in 1314 or what the Declaration of Arbroath was.
As usual, agent makes sweeping and untrue generalisations. How can you say no Scottish child learns about any English history? It is so easy to prove false as to be not worthy of further comment. _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 4210 Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mairead wrote: | | Boadicea and the Romans in England etc etc. |
Well, considering England didn't exist back then...
| Holebender wrote: | | Nelson was a British figure? Really? How did that famous signal go again... oh yes... "England expects..." |
Are you seriously suggesting that changes anything? _________________ The resident pantomime villain.
'Socialists cry "Power to the people", and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean—power over people, power to the State.' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 2902 Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
maybe not as such. I am well aware of the divided kingdoms of England but none the less it was of no interest to the Scots so why should they learn about it and not about their own divided Kingdom. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 2902 Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Holebender.
I would suggest that, like me, you are wasting your time trying to get the message across.
Obviously Aventinian is an English educated person who sees no further than what he was taught. He has a closed mind in which truth does not interfere with a good story.. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aventinian 'Our Scotland' Fossil

Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 4210 Location: Broadcasting From An Anonymous Location Within the United Kingdom.
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| mairead wrote: | | Obviously Aventinian is an English educated person who sees no further than what he was taught. He has a closed mind in which truth does not interfere with a good story.. |
I have never been educated anywhere outside of Scotland, as I have made clear on this forum before. No doubt you'd like to demonise me as some sort of dirty foreign immigrant, but it's far from the truth.
Truth? Truth seems to be your rather odd assertions about Scottish education, which it appears are based on your own experience rather than anybody else's. It strikes me that you're also encouraging the politicisation of history, which is very dangerous and revolting indeed.
| Quote: | | maybe not as such. I am well aware of the divided kingdoms of England but none the less it was of no interest to the Scots so why should they learn about it and not about their own divided Kingdom. |
The Scots didn't exist then either. Picts and Britons were about the extent of national groups that could be identified.
However, that's not the point - why shouldn't they learn about history elsewhere? Should children not be taught about the colonialisation of other countries, or the Holocaust, or the American Civil War? The Russian revolution maybe? It's a ridiculous and insular position to take. _________________ The resident pantomime villain.
'Socialists cry "Power to the people", and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean—power over people, power to the State.' |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender I need ma own bl**dy forum!
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1246 Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Aventinian wrote: | | Truth? Truth seems to be your rather odd assertions about Scottish education, which it appears are based on your own experience rather than anybody else's. |
Indeed.
Mr. Pot, I'd like to introduce you to Mr. Black! _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1812 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mairead wrote: | | Then you are both exceptions if you in fact went to Scottish schools. |
Well I had all my schooling in Paisley, for my sins.
| Quote: |
My own history education was all English history, not even British. Magna Carta, Hastings, Henry 8th, King Alfred, Boadicea and the Romans in England etc etc.. |
You must be pushing 90? _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1812 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Holebender wrote: | | Nelson was a British figure? Really? How did that famous signal go again... oh yes... "England expects..." |
And how does that make him any less a British figure?
| Quote: |
I'd wager if you were to survey a cross-section of Scottish children you'd find more who could tell you what happened in 1066 and what the Magna Carta was than could tell you what happened in 1314 or what the Declaration of Arbroath was. |
I'd wager you'd be sorely disappointed in either case.
| Quote: | | How can you say no Scottish child learns about any English history? |
Well the Standard grade and Higher curriculum makes no reference to anything that could be called 'English' history.
| Quote: | | It is so easy to prove false as to be not worthy of further comment. |
Go on, give it a shot. _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1812 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mairead wrote: | | maybe not as such. I am well aware of the divided kingdoms of England but none the less it was of no interest to the Scots so why should they learn about it and not about their own divided Kingdom. |
Even by your standards that's pretty insular. In your future tartan paradise will all reference to the world beyond the Cheviots be banished completely? _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 2902 Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What a bloody load of codswallop. I suggested no such thing, but I have noticed that is the sort of argument which you and your friend Aventinian frequently bring up.
The point I was making was merely that it is good thing for Scottish children to learn about Scottish history.
Must you turn everything into an anti-English rant. I am not anti English but I am pro Scottish.
Furthermore, my opinions are as valid as yours or anyone else's. You don't have to share them, but that does not necessarily make me wrong and you always correct either. Obviously you have never been in a good debating society or you would have learned something about conducting debates and discussions...
PS. I am nowhere near the ninety age, and if you think I am then show some respect for your elders, or is respect just another part of your education which is sorely lacking. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1812 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mairead wrote: | | I suggested no such thing |
Pub quiz time - who said:
| Quote: |
it was of no interest to the Scots so why should they learn about it |
| Quote: |
I am not anti English |
That's right. And some of my best friends are bigoted nationalist rednecks.
| Quote: | | I am nowhere near the ninety age |
85? _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Holebender I need ma own bl**dy forum!
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1246 Location: Here or There
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| agentmancuso wrote: |
| Quote: | | How can you say no Scottish child learns about any English history? |
Well the Standard grade and Higher curriculum makes no reference to anything that could be called 'English' history.
| Quote: | | It is so easy to prove false as to be not worthy of further comment. |
Go on, give it a shot. |
I just asked the 12-year-old boy who lives across the street if he knew about the Norman Conquest and if he had learned it in school. He told me he had.
There you are, the first Scottish child I asked learned some English history in school. Care to revise your statement? _________________ "My instinct is to agree with your opinion of his verse, but I've never so much as glanced at it." - agentmancuso |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mairead Ready For Afterlife!

Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 2902 Location: Argyll, Alba
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
As I am married to an lovely English gentleman, I think proves that I am not anti-English.
Yes I have no doubt that some of your friends are exactly as you describe.
Age insults don't bother me in the slightest by the way. Call me Methuslah if you like, but remember that wisdom comes with age, and someday you may even wisen up. _________________ I fear not hell, nor English strife,
For Scotland, I will give my life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
agentmancuso Getting on a bit!

Joined: 06 Sep 2006 Posts: 1812 Location: Darkest Lanarkshire
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| mairead wrote: | | As I am married to an lovely English gentleman, I think proves that I am not anti-English. |
| Quote: | | Age insults don't bother me in the slightest by the way. Call me Methuslah if you like, but remember that wisdom comes with age, and someday you may even wisen up. |
I'm not sure why you think the suggestion that you're 90 is an insult. You said that:
| Quote: |
My own history education was all English history, not even British. Magna Carta, Hastings, Henry 8th, King Alfred, Boadicea and the Romans in England etc etc.. |
Which sounds like a reasonable summary of the sort of curriculum a 90 year old might have experienced in history don't you think? _________________ Liberty does not mean all good things, or the absence of all evils
Hayek |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|