 |
Our Scotland - www.our-scotland.org Scottish Politics Discussion Forum / Messageboard - Dedicated to online discussion about Scottish Politics and an Independent Scotland, as well as Scottish Society today. We also have a section dedicated to Banter, Sport and Recommended Sites.
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Cruachan Helping with the Count

Joined: 19 May 2008 Posts: 295
Location: The English Midlands
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:39 am Post subject: And still it grows |
|
|
Very encouraging levels of support (58%) for a Referendum. Helps pile on the pressure on the Unionist parties come the Referendum Bill debate at Holyrood.
Also the 42% who would vote in favour of the Scottish Government proposed wording is important. May encourage Gordon Brown to seek to control the whole thing from Whitehall/Westminster with his own wording like "Do you want become a wee separatist country and break the Union asunder".
Scots 'want an independence vote'
The Scottish Government wants a referendum next year
An opinion poll commissioned by BBC Scotland has shown a clear majority (58%) of Scots want a referendum on independence next year.
The poll also suggests support for the Union outstrips that for independence from the UK.
However, the poll found the percentage of people saying they support independence varies widely depending on how the question is phrased.
The Scottish Government wants to hold a referendum on the issue in 2010.
The poll of 1,010 people, carried out between 22 and 24 June by ICM, found 58% of respondents were in favour of the idea of holding a referendum next year on whether Scotland should become independent, with only 37% against.
Range of scenarios
When asked "In a referendum on independence for Scotland, how would you vote?", 38% responded that they believed Scotland should become an independent country, with 54% saying they did not believe it should become independent.
However, the pollsters also asked a separate question asking whether people agreed or disagreed that "the Scottish Government should negotiate a settlement with the government of the United Kingdom so that Scotland becomes an independent state" - the preferred wording of the Scottish Government for a future referendum.
In this case, 42% agreed with the statement, with 50% opposed.
The poll also asked which of a range of scenarios were closest to people's views of how Scotland should be governed.
Under this wording, only 28% backed the option of Scotland becoming independent of the rest of the UK, with 47% in favour of remaining in the UK, with the Scottish Parliament able to make some decisions about the level of taxation and government spending in Scotland.
A further 22% said Scotland should remain part of the UK, with decisions about the level of taxation and spending in Scotland made by the UK Government.
Finally, respondents were asked whether they believed it was likely or unlikely Scotland would become completely independent from the UK within the next 20 years.
Rather than looking at this poll or that poll or this question or that question, it is the trend, it is the direction of travel
Alex Salmond
First Minister
The results showed that 10% thought it was very likely and 28% believed it was quite likely.
However, a larger percentage were not so sure, with 34% responding that it was quite unlikely and 24% believing independence was very unlikely.
Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond said it was clear that the way questions were asked in polls played a large part in how people responded.
Using the example of the poll suggesting most Scots wanted defence and foreign affairs to be left to Westminster, Mr Salmond said: "If you asked: 'Should we decide whether or not Scottish troops are sent to an illegal war in Iraq', most people would say we should take that decision in Scotland.
"Rather than looking at this poll or that poll or this question or that question, it is the trend, it is the direction of travel.
"Which direction are people going in? I think it is crystal clear from this poll and from many others that the trend is to see an increasingly powerful parliament because people think and believe, I think rightly, that the parliament has earned the trust of the people of Scotland."
Politics professor John Curtice, of the University of Strathclyde, said the findings suggested that 10 years of devolution - including two years of SNP government - had done little to whet Scots' appetite for independence.
"The straightforward question on whether people want independence or not has been asked many times by ICM over the past 10 years. At 37%, those saying they backed independence has never been lower, while at 54% the proportion saying they are against has never been higher.
"The option of proposing a multi-option referendum rather than a simple vote on independence must be beginning to look increasingly attractive to the SNP government.
"It seems as though a third option of increasing the tax powers of the Scottish parliament, but remaining part of the Union would be by far the most popular option."
_________________ IT'S TIME.
http://loosechange-cruachan.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dave Coull Independentista
Joined: 07 Nov 2006 Posts: 2632
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | the pollsters also asked a separate question asking whether people agreed or disagreed that "the Scottish Government should negotiate a settlement with the government of the United Kingdom so that Scotland becomes an independent state" - the preferred wording of the Scottish Government for a future referendum | Although I have always been in favour of keeping the referendum as simple and straightforward as possible, I can see the logic for this question. If folk are asked simply "independence - yes or no?", and they say yes, and then, despite that result, the day after the referendum, and for a very long time after that, we are still not independent, then a lot of folk might not understand why, despite having voted for it, we still don't have independence. This preferred wording at least gives a mandate to NEGOTIATE an independence settlement, so, although there will be a significant gap between the referendum result and actual independence, everybody will know what is supposed to be happening during that time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
magister ludi Activist

Joined: 13 Dec 2008 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Assuming a yes vote to that question........in subsequent elections to the Scottish Parliament the issue for the electorate becomes "who do you trust to negotiate an independence settlement....conservative & unionist party, green party, labour party, liberal democrat party, scottish national party, other? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Red Justice This is Ma' Life!

Joined: 17 Jan 2008 Posts: 725
Location: Kirkcaldy, Fife
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I do not trust any of them. Independence will have to deal with scrapping Trident and withdrawing from NATO. Unfortunately the SNP put to much faith in the EU.
Negotiations would be tricky with Westminster and the breaking of crown powers (originating by way of the monarchy) is central to full independence. _________________ “For socialists, independence is not about the colour or type of flag flying on our public buildings. It is about creating a better society. It is about putting people before profit"
Tommy Sheridan
http://scottishsocfree.blogspot.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
malcolmtucker Confirmed TROLL
Joined: 12 May 2009 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| hahahaha, 'breaking the crown powers'. brilliant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stevie Independentist

Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 1003
|
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| malcolmtucker wrote: | | hahahaha, 'breaking the crown powers'. brilliant. |
People who laugh at their own jokes generally aren't funny. Even so, here, I don't see what's making you laugh O' trollish one.
Still, if you're happy that's the main thing. _________________ Every man dies, not every man really lives.
Alba gu bràth! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
magister ludi Activist

Joined: 13 Dec 2008 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Red Justice wrote: |
Negotiations would be tricky with Westminster and the breaking of crown powers (originating by way of the monarchy) is central to full independence. |
Whether i'm a citizen or a subject is not that high up on my personal list of priorities, but your point about negotiations being tricky is well made, particularly in relation to the crown. That being so, it's my view ( just a personal view, you understand) that it is neither necessary nor desirable to "break the crown". What is necessary, i believe, it to break to mindset that links Westminster with the Crown. Westminster acts in the name of the Crown, but they are different. The Governments of Australia and Canada for example also act in the name of the Crown but owe nothing to Westminster.
Tricky yes, impossible far from it. Templates already exist all over what was once "the empire".
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|